HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CA

January 10, 2012


Date prepared :  January 7, 2012
Dated posted :    January 10, 2012


To be posted on the World  Wide  Web


www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
www.crimevictimspress.com
www.Facebook.com/LinoDial
www.Twitter.com/LinoDial


TITLE :  HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CA


Author :  Dr.  Lino  Dial , I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.


                        ONE - PAGE  SUMMARY  NO.  6


Documents and Evidences  about the 53 crimes are in the California Medical Board and Dept. of Justice.
The California Medical Board declared in writing and officially proclaimed that No violation of the Law was committed by the Hospital and Doctors in Vallejo, California that's why No prosecution was done.


Conspiracy waives Statutes of Limitations.  In other words, the Statutes of Limitations do not apply when there is Conspiracy.


THE CRIMES OF ATTORNEY STEVEN V. SCHNIER OF SAN FRANCISCO, CA


     Attorney Schnier is the senior partner in the law firm  HANSON BRIDGETT  LLP  of  San  Francisco, California.
http://www.hansonbridgett.com
Mr. Schnier is a graduate of Stanford University Law School.  He had a
B.S. degree from University of California.
He is among the Best Lawyers in America ( 1995 - 2011 ).
Northern California  Super Lawyers ( 2006 - 2011 ).


THIS IS HOW ATTORNEY SCHNIER COMMITTED THE 53 CRIMES :


1.  Judicial Hearing was held according to law in Vallejo, California.
2.  Attorney Schnier committed the crimes during the Judicial Hearing.
3.  The crimes of Mr. Schnier were witnessed nine California physicians.
4.  The crimes of Mr. Schnier were instantly recorded by the official court transcriber in the 100 - page transcript of that Judicial Hearing.
5.  Mr. Schnier was the Hospital Attorney during the Judicial Hearing.
6.  Mr. Schnier proclaimed, declared and presented the fraudulent, deceitful,  intentional  misrepresentation of facts, wrongful criminal deceptions prepared by the Hospital and Medical Staff.  
     These were submitted and accepted as evidences during the hearing.
7.  The  entire Judicial Hearing was about Dr.  Lino  Dial.
8.  The pages mentioned here as evidences are from the transcript.
9.  On  page  7  lines  4 - 8  of the transcript, Mr. Schnier said :
     Initially, there was ( hospital ) investigation ( of Dr. Dial ) ,  then as a result of that, a monitoring program ( of Dr. Dial ) , and then finally an  executive committee ( of Medical Staff )  recommendation  against reappointment ( of Dr. Dial ) to the Medical Staff.  Then  Dr.  Dial requested a Judicial Hearing which was granted by the hospital.
10.  On  page  4  lines  19 - 22 :  Dr.  Dial asked for the criteria used by the  Hospital and Medical Staff in the hospital investigation of Dr. Dial, which took place one year before the Judicial  Review  Hearing.
Hospital Attorney , Mr. Schnier :  No  Criteria.
11.  On  page  5  lines  1 - 14 :  
       Dr.  Dial emphasized :  Before the hospital investigation , there should be a set of criteria to be used during the investigation.  That was a year ago.  If it was available then , it should be available now.
Where is the criteria ?
12.  On  page  66  lines  3 - 4 :  Dr. Dial  emphasized the importance of 
random sampling of hospital records during the hospital investigation.
13.  On  page  66  lines  4 - 5 :  Mr. Schnier said : " I don't think there ever was a random sampling."
Coment of Dr. Dial :  No criteria and No random sampling means that the the hospital investigation of Dr. Dial was biased and prejudiced !!!


To be continued.


The end for now.