HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA

January 10, 2012


Date prepared :  December 22, 2011
Posted on :  January 10, 2012


To be posted on the  World Wide  Web.


www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
www.crimevictimspress.com
www.Facebook.com/LinoDial
www.Twitter.com/LinoDial


Title :  HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA.


Author :  Dr.  Lino  Dial ,  I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.


ONE - PAGE  SUMMARY  NO.  5.


CONSPIRACY WAIVES STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS.  IN OTHER WORDS, THE STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY WHEN THERE IS CONSPIRACY.


Documents and Evidences about the 53 crimes are in the California Medical Board and Dept. of Justice.
The California Medical Board declared in writing and officially proclaimed that No violation of the Law was committed by the Hospital and Doctors in the City of Vallejo, in Solano County, California, USA.  That's why No prosecution was done.


     In the Hospital Cover Up of 53 crimes, there are Four basic Steps or Stages or we can call them  " Houses ".
     The Hospital and Doctors are like people who built houses on frauds or sand instead of on solid  Rock.  When floods or Florida Hurricane  or  Philippine  Typhoon  came, they fell with a mighty crash.


1.  Step  No.  1  or  House  No.  1.  
      The crimes of Dr. Robert  S.  Blum were presented in One - Page  Summaries  No.  1 ,  No.  2 ,  No.  3.


2.  Step  No.  2  or  House  No.  2.
     Hospital Cover Up and False or fraudulent investigation of Dr. Lino Dial.
It was biased and prejudiced because  No Criteria was used during the investigation and Random Sampling was done in the selection of Hospital medical records to be reviewed.


3.  Step  No.  3  or  House  No.  3.
     Judicial Hearing and 53 crimes committed during the hearing which was held according to law.  
     After the hearing, the Hospital and Doctors declared in writing that the hearing never took place.  Their reasoning :  No  hearing ,  No  crime.


4.  Step  No.  4  or  House  No.  4.
     Lawsuit filed in California Superior Court, Solano County Case No. 87291.
     The reason for the lawsuit was the removal of Hospital Privileges of Dr.  Lino  Dial  without cause,  the 53 crimes committed during the Judicial Hearing and the cover Up that followed.


     The steps  No.  2 ,  No.  3 ,  and  No. 4  are inseparable because the lies, deceits, frauds, deceptions and falsehoods which took place or recorded in Step  No.  2 or the Hospital investigation were the same lies, deceits, frauds, deceptions and falsehoods used or presented in Step No. 3 ( during the Judicial Hearing ).
     The same lies, deceits, frauds, deceptions and falsehoods were concealed or Not mentioned  during the Court  Hearing in California Superior Court in Solano County , Case No. 87291.
     More frauds were presented or declared by Dr. Leonard A. Brant during the hearing in Superior Court.
     The Superior Court made a decision based on frauds, lies, falsehoods and deceptions.  The Court decision is invalid and should be changed.


     STARTING  ON  ONE - PAGE SUMMARY  NO.  6


More lies, deceits, frauds, falsehoods and deceptions will be presented.


Examples :


1.  Dr.  Robert S. Blum who committed crimes was  Not  investigated.


2.  Dr.  Lino  Dial , the victim of the crimes was  investigated.


3.  No  Criteria  used in the investigation of Dr.  Lino  Dial.


Evidence :


     Transcript of the Judicial  Hearing ,  page  4  lines  19 - 22 :


Dr.  Dial asked the hospital attorney, Mr. Schnier, for the criteria used when I was investigated by the hospital and Medical Staff.  The investigation was over a year before the Judicial Hearing.


The reason :
     If the criteria used for the investigation was available a year ago,  it should be available today.


Page  5  line  20 :  Mr.  Schnier :  No  criteria.


Page  9  line  8 :    Dr. Dial asked whether criteria was given to Doctors who investigated me.


4.  No  Random  Sampling of hospital records during the hospital investigation of Dr. Lino Dial.


Evidence :


Page  66  line  5 :  Mr.  Schnier said :  "  I don't think there ever was a random sampling."


NO RANDOM SAMPLING MEANS THAT THE INVESTIGATION OF DR. DIAL


WAS  BIASED  AND  PREJUDICED  !!


References :


www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial


www.crimevictimspress.com


To be continued.     Next is  One - Page  Summary  No.  6.


The  end  for  now.