Series of Fifty-three (53) Hospital Falsifications

July 5, 2010

Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications

PART - III Hospital Falsifications Nos. 6 thru 13.


9. Hospital Falsification No. 9.

On page 60 Lines 21 -- 22 of the transcript of the
same Judicial Hearing the situation was the same.

Supposedly , I admitted a patient to the Hospital during
the monitoring or investigation period.

A Physician investigated the patient and the Hospital
Attorney received a report of the investigation . Again ,
there are two instances of frauds here .

The investigation was a fraud because the patient was

dead before the investigation . The report made by the

the Doctor was also a fraud.


Question :

How many times do we allow a Hospital , Medical Staff

and their Attorney to tell lies and falsehoods during

a Legal proceeding ?


10. Hospital Falsification No. 10.

The lies , deceits and frauds made against me were
documented and recorded in the transcript.

No wonder after the hearing , the Hospital claimed in
writing that the hearing never took place.

They don't want anybody to see what is in the transcript. I am not yet finished . There are many more
falsities and falsehoods.

On page 61 Lines 6 -- 9 of the transcript ,
Dr. Edwin Bradley, M.D. the chairman of a panel of six
Physicians who were there at the hearing like a jury to
judge me , said :

" We talked about a monitoring or investigation period.
This case was in the hospital and died a year before
the investigation and yet you ( referring to Hospital
Attorney ) speak of monitoring reports . "

This is a confirmation of the falsehood of the preceding
statements.


Question :

Why do people tell lies , deceits and falsehoods

during a Judicial Hearing ?