Series of Fifty-three (53) Hospital Falsifications

July 7, 2010

Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsificationa

PART - IV Hospital Falsifications Nos. 16 thru 53 .


16. Hospital Falsification Nos. 16 thru 53.

The investigation of Dr. Lino Dial .

Dr. Lino Dial was placed on investigation or monitoring program
for a period of six months ( per hospital document submitted and
accepted as evidence during the Judicial Hearing ) .

It is important to point out that if a Hospital and Medical Staff
will investigate any doctor , it must be done fairly and without
bias or prejudice .

The following pages in the transcript show that there was bias
and prejudice or unfair investigation of Dr. Lino Dial .

Persons speaking in the transcript :

Mr. Steven V. Schnier , ESQ., Hospital Attorney ,
from San Francisco , California.

Dr. Edwin Bradley , M.D. , Chairman of panel of six Physicians,
from Fairfield , California .

The evidence :

Page 66 Lines 3 -- 4 : Dr. Lino Dial speaking :

Random sampling is very important .

Page 66 Lines 5 -- 6 : Hospital attorney says : I don't think there

ever was a random sampling ( admission of

prejudice or bias direct from the hospital

attorney's mouth ).

Page 66 Line 16 : Dr. Edwin Bradley says :

So there was No randomness .

Page 66 Line 20 : Hospital attorney, Mr. Schnier , says True .

( comment of Dr. Lino Dial :

I don't think the Hospital Attorney , Mr. Steven V. Schnier, ESQ. of

San Francisco has any idea at all about random sampling ) .


Now let us count more lies , deceits and frauds :

The Hospital Attorney , Mr. Steven V. Schnier , ESQ . :

1. He told the first lie or fraud , on page 8 Line 26 .

2. He told a lie a second time on page 9 Line 1 .

3. He told a lie a third time on page 66.

4. He told a lie a fourth time on page 66.

The evidence :

Page 66 Lines 7 -- 8 : Dr. Bradley asked :

How were the cases reviewed ?

How were those chosen ?

( Remember : No random sampling ) .

Page 66 Lines 9 -- 10 : Hospital Attorney says :

During the monitoring program Each and Every

Hospitalization Was Reviewed .

( comment of Dr. Dial :

The hospital attorney shows his lack of understanding ) .


Page 66 Lines 22 -- 23 : Hospital Attorney says :

Once again there was No random sampling.

( comment of Dr. Dial :

The hospital attorney shows more lack of understanding .

The hospital attorney was confused ) .

The evidence that the hospital attorney was confused :

Page 66 Lines 9 -- 10 : Hospital Attorney says :

During the monitoring program , Each and

Every Hospitalization was reviewed ( meaning

Dr. Dial's patients ) .

Page 66 Line 17 : Dr. Bradley says :

Not all the charts were reviewed ....

Just certain charts .

Page 66 Line 20 : Hospital Attorney says : TRUE . .

Page 66 Line 25 : Dr. Bradley asks : Everyone ?

( was reviewed ? ) .

Page 66 Line 26 : Hospital Attorney answers : YES .


The Hospital Attorney , Mr. Steven V. Schnier , ESQ . :

He told a lie or falsehood for the fifth time on page 66 Line 26.

Mr. Schnier said Each Patient admitted by Dr. Lino Dial during

the six month period of investigation Was reviewed .

( comment of Dr. Dial :

Mr. Schnier just told a Big Lie , a Falsity and a Falsehood ) .

The evidence :

At this time I submitted a list of my patients who were admitted

to the hospital during the six month period of monitoring and

investigation of Dr. Dial .

There are sixteen ( 16 ) patients who were Not reviewed .

Each patient is given a count of one ( 1 ) .

Five ( 5 ) plus sixteen ( 16 ) make ( 21 ) times that the hospital

Attorney , Mr. Schnier told lies , deceits and falsehoods during the

Judicial Hearing , a legal proceeding . This was proven by

the transcript of that hearing .

Mr. Steven V. Schnier, ESQ , the hospital attorney , is an officer

of the Law , a Public Officer , or a Peace Officer .

Government code section 1031 , subdivision ( b ) provides that each

Public Officer or Peace Officer shall " be of Good Moral character ....".

( comment of Dr. Dial : What about telling lies or falsehoods ? ) .


More evidence of Lies and Deceits :

Page 8 Lines 24 -- 25 :

The hospital attorney says that he reviewed monitoring reports on

ALL patients admitted by Dr. Lino Dial during the six months of

monitoring period .

I submitted the evidence that sixteen ( 16 ) patients , with names ,

Hospital room and bed numbers Were NOT Reviewed during the six

months period of investigation of Dr. Lino Dial .

It stands to reason that if the sixteen ( 16 ) of my patients Were

NOT reviewed then there were NO Monitoring Reports .

That gives another sixteen ( 16 ) counts of frauds in addition

to the twenty - one ( 21 ) .

Sixteen ( 16 ) lies plus Twenty - one ( 21 ) frauds make a total of

Thirty - seven ( 37 ) falsehoods .

The Physicians who produced the monitoring reports on the

sixteen ( 16 ) patients added another sixteen ( 16 ) lies and frauds .

Thirty - seven ( 37 ) plus sixteen ( 16 ) make a total of

Fifty - three ( 53 ) lies , deceits and frauds committed by lawyer and

Physicians during the legal proceeding .


Submitted by :

Dr. Lino Dial

My e-mail : LinoADial2001@yahoo.com