Series of Fifty-three (53) Hospital Falsifications

July 5, 2010

Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications

PART - III Hospital Falsifications Nos. 6 thru 13.


11. Hospital Falsification No. 11.

The result of the investigation of the Hospital practice of medicine of Dr. Lino Dial was discussed at
the Judicial Hearing. The investigation was full of lies,
deceits and falsehoods.

On page 14 Lines 24 -- 25 of the transcript of the
same Judicial Hearing , the chairman of the panel of
six physicians, Dr. Edwin Bradley of Fairfield , CA
told the Hospital Attorney, Mr. Steven V. Schnier , that
we have a patient here who was hospitalized a year
before the investigation.

On page 15 Line 26 , the hospital attorney said yes.
This is another confirmation that the hospital attorney
told lies , deceits and falsehoods.

The investigation was a fraud . The patient was not
in the hospital during the investigation .

The Doctor's report is a fraud . How could the
Doctor investigate the patient in the hospital when the
patient was not there ?


Question :

When will they stop telling lies and falsehoods ?


12. Hospital Falsification No. 12.

Here are two more instances of frauds during the
so - called investigation Dr. Dial at the hospital.

On page 24 Lines 18 --- 19 , the hospital presented
another investigation of a patient of Dr. Lino Dial.

Again , this patient was also hospitalized one year
before the so - called investigation or monitoring of the
hospital medical practice of Dr. Lino Dial .

The investigation was a fraud .
The investigation or monitoring report is fraud.
The Doctor's report is fraud.


Question :

How could anyone make a report of an

investigation when the patient was not even in the

hospital during the so - called investigation ?


13. Hospital Falsification No. 13.

Here are evidences of lies , deceits and falsehoods
committed by the Hospital and Medical Staff during
the investigation of the hospital medical practice of
Dr. Lino Dial.

On page 41 Line 13 , the hospitalization of the
patient was described.

On page 41 Line 21 , the patient is said to be
a hundred ( 100 ) years old .

On page 41 Lines 15 -- 16 , it was read that this

patient was hospitalized outside the investigation period.

Therefore , any report about this patient is fraud.

The Physician who made a report committed fraud also.


Question :

Should Attorneys know when frauds are committed ?