Series of Fifty-three (53) Hospital Falsifications

July 5, 2010

Series of Fifty - three (53) Hospital Falsifications

By Dr. Lino Dial

PART - II Hospital Falsifications Nos. 2 thru 5.


2. Hospital Falsification No. 2.

Background :

Dr. Robert S. Blum falsified the Hospital medical record of an old woman. The patient was not his. The Physician
in charge of the patient was Dr. Lino Dial.

The Hospital and Medical Staff covered - up the illegal
and unethical actions of Dr. Blum. The hospital investigated Dr. Lino Dial instead of Dr. Blum who falsified the hospital record.

False accusations or fabricated charges were made in writing against Dr. Dial.

Conclusion of the investigation of Dr. Dial :

That Dr. Lino Dial is a bad doctor and his Hospital privileges should be removed.

They forgot to mention that they told lies , deceits , and
falsehoods during a Judicial Hearing.

According to the Hospital by - laws, Dr. Dial was entitled
to a Judicial Review Hearing. Judicial Review was requested by Dr. Dial and granted by the Hospital.

Question :

Why did the Hospital make false accusations against

Dr. Dial ?


3. Hospital Falsification No. 3.

The preparation for the Judicial Review Hearing took about six months. The same false accusations or fabricated
charges were made against Dr. Lino Dial. These false
accusations were already proven to be false during the
investigations of Dr. Lino Dial.

The evidence that proved them wrong or false were the
hospital patient medical records.

This time these were submitted as official written charges against Dr. Dial. The evidences were the same.
Conclusion was the same.

This time the same accusations or charges were made
during a Judicial Hearing , a Legal Proceeding and testimony is under oath on the witness stand.

Question :

Why would the Hospital and Medical Staff

accuse me ( I am Dr. Lino Dial ) of the same charges

that were already proven false ?

( They convicted themselves ) !


4. Hospital Falsification No. 4.

The Judicial Review Hearing was held according to the
laws of California. It was a legal proceeding.

There were ten persons present during the hearing. The
official court transcriber produced a hundred - page
transcript of the hearing. The entire hearing was about me. I was present at the hearing.

After the hearing , the Hospital claimed in writing that the hearing never took place and that it was canceled.

Question :

Why would the Hospital and Medical Staff declare that

the Judicial Review did not take place ?


( A series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital falsities and
falsehoods were presented at the Judicial Hearing ).


5. Hospital Falsification No. 5.

It is undeniable and incontestable that the Judicial
Review Hearing , a legal proceeding was held according
to law. The evidences that it was held :

Ten persons were present at the hearing.

The official court transcriber produced a hundred pages
of transcript of the hearing.

I presented the 100 - page transcript of the hearing to
the Medical Board of California.

The reason given by the Hospital ( in writing ) that the
Judicial Review Hearing did not take place is that
Dr. Lino Dial canceled it.

This is a lie , a fraud and a falsehood because I was
present at the hearing.

Question :

How could I cancel the Judicial Hearing which I attended ?