Series of Fifty-three (53) Hospital Falsifications

July 5, 2010

Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications

PART - III Hospital Falsifications Nos. 6 thru 13.


6. Hospital Falsification No. 6.

Attorneys are officers of the Law. In a Judicial Hearing
they are supposed to tell the truth like everybody else.

During the Judicial Hearing , the Hospital Attorney,
Mr. Steven V. Schnier, ESQ. of San Francisco, CA was
caught telling a lie , or deceit or fraud , at least three
times. This is in the transcript of that same Judicial
Hearing.

The first time that the Hospital Attorney told a lie
or a falsity is on page 8 Line 26 of the transcript.
I asked the hospital Lawyer whether he asked for report for monitoring or investigation of my patients.
The Hospital Attorney answered yes.

The reason the Hospital Attorney's answer is a lie
or a fraud is that the patient was ALREADY DEAD
for a year during the so - called investigation.

Question :

How can anyone admit a patient to the Hospital ,

investigate the patient , and have a report when the

patient was already dead before the investigation ?


7. Hospital Falsification No. 7.

In the transcript of the Judicial Hearing , the Hospital Attorney told a lie or falsehood for the first
time on page 8 Line 26 after I asked him whether
he received monitoring reports and he answered yes.

It was not possible to have a monitoring or
investigation report because the patient was dead
before the investigation.

The Hospital Attorney told a lie or a fraud a second time , recorded in the transcript , is on
page 9 line 3. He answered yes after I asked him
whether the Doctor who investigated my patient
submitted a report. This is a lie and a falsity for
the same reason.


Question :

How can a Physician investigate and make a report

on a patient who died a year before the investigation ?


8. Hospital Falsification No. 8.

The Hospital Attorney told lies , deceits and falsities
for the first , second , and third time in this section.
He told many more lies and falsehoods.

A hospital document was submitted and accepted as
evidence during the hearing. It stated that the Hospital
will investigate hospitalized or in - patient hospital patients of Dr. Lino Dial during a six month period.

The first time that the Hospital Attorney told lies ,
deceits and falsehoods , there were actually two counts
or instances of frauds : The first is that he said he
received a report. The second is that the investigating
Physician made a report.

These are frauds because the patient was in the Cemetery and has been dead for a while during the investigation.

The second time that the Hospital Attorney told lies
and deceits , there were two counts or instances of
frauds also.

The third time that the Hospital Attorney told lies
and deceits is on page 56 Lines 16 -- 17 of the
transcript of the same Judicial Hearing.

This is another patient who died , was buried in
the cemetery while the Hospital and the Hospital Lawyer
claim that the same patient was sick and supposedly I admitted him to the hospital and they
even have reports of their investigations .


Question :

How could I admit a patient to the hospital

and for any Doctor to investigate him when he was

already dead before the investigation ?


9. Hospital Falsification No. 9.

On page 60 Lines 21 -- 22 of the transcript of
the same Judicial Hearing the situation was the same.

Supposedly , I admitted a patient to the Hospital
during the monitoring or investigation period , a
Physician investigated the case and the Hospital
Attorney received a report of the investigation.
Again , there are two instances of frauds here .

Th