February 21, 2012
Date prepared : February 20, 2012
Date posted : February 21, 2012
To be posted on the World Wide Web
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
www.crimevictimspress.com
www.Facebook.com/LinoDial
www.Twitter.com/LinoDial
TITLE : HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA
Author : Dr. Lino Dial , I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.
ONE - PAGE SUMMARY NO. 20
REFERENCE :
UNFAIR PROCEDURE in the so - called investigation or monitoring or
Peer - Review of Dr. Lino Dial. This was done in BAD - FAITH.
NO RANDOM SAMPLING of Hospital patient medical records during the
investigation or monitoring or Peer - Review.
Reference :
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION , MAY 16 , 1988.
Dr. Patrick vs. Burget et al ( Doctors who did Bad - Faith Peer - Review)
Dr. Patrick won the case. This was the cover story of World Medical News
June 27, 1988.
THE CRIMES COMMITTED DURING THE JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING.
1. The Hospital , the Medical Staff , their attorney Mr. Schnier , prepared and submitted false evidences against me during the Judicial Hearing.
2. The reason for the Judicial Review Hearing was that the Hospital and the Medical Staff terminated the Hospital Privileges of Dr. Lino Dial without cause after a Bad - Faith Hospital Monitoring or investigation or
Peer - Review of Dr. Lino Dial.
3. In the One - Page Summary No. 15 , on Page 8 lines 7 - 23 of the
transcript of the Judicial Review Hearing :
The Monitoring Program ( Hospital investigation of Dr. Lino Dial ) was
instituted by the Medical Staff Executive Committee to last for six months.
In other words, they made the rule that patients I admitted to the hospital during those six months will be monitored or investigated or examined by my Peers ( Peer - Review ).
The Evidence : Transcript of the Judicial Review Hearing.
NO RANDOM SAMPLING OF THE HOSPITAL PATIENT MEDICAL RECORDS
DURING THE SIX MONTHS OF MONITORING OR PEER - REVIEW OR HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION.
Page 66 lines 3 - 4 : Dr. Dial says : " Random sampling is very
important ."
Page 66 lines 5 - 6 : Mr. Schnier answers : " I don't think there ever
Random sampling ."
Page 66 lines 16 - 19 : Question for Mr. Schnier : " So there was no
randomness and not all the charts were reviewed---
just certain charts --- and those charts were selected
because there were some questions about them ."
Page 66 line 20 : Mr. Schnier answers : " True " .
CONCLUSION :
Attorney Schnier admitted during the Judicial Review Hearing that there was no random sampling during the hospital monitoring or investigation or Peer - Review of Dr. Lino Dial.
The so - called Peer - Review or monitoring or investigation of Dr. Dial
was done in Bad - Faith.
Reference :
PROCEDURAL PROTECTIONS DUE PHYSICIAN BEFORE TERMINATION OF HIS HOSPITAL PRIVILEGES SET FORTH :
42 U.S.C.A. SS 1983 , 1985 U.S.C.A. , Const. , Amend. 14.
To be continued.
The end for now.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment