HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA

February 15, 2012


Date prepared :  February 15, 2012
Date posted :  February 15, 2012


To be posted on the World wide Web
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
www.crimevictimspress.com
www.Facebook.com/LinoDial
www.Twitter.com/LinoDial


TITLE :  HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA


Author :  Dr. Lino  Dial , I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.


                              ONE - PAGE  SUMMARY  NO.  17
                               
REFERENCE :
1.  Procedures followed by Hospital Medical Staff in determining whether to terminate Physician's Staff Privileges MUST BE FUNDAMENTALLY FAIR.


Suckle v.  Madison General Hospital,
362  F.  supp.   1196,   Affirmed   499  F.  2d  1364.


THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY STEVEN  V.  SCHNIER  OF
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA


1.  In the One - Page Summary No.  15,  on  Page  8   lines  7 - 23 :
      The monitoring program ( Hospital investigation of Dr. Lino Dial ) was instituted by the Medical Staff Executive Committee to last for six months.
In other words,  they made the rule that patients I admitted to the hospital during those six months will be monitored or examined or investigated.


2.  In the One - Page Summary No.  16, the Hospital, Medical Staff and their attorney broke or did not follow their own rule.
The evidence for not following their own rule was when Mr. Schnier presented and discussed a patient who was not hospitalized at all during the established six months of monitoring period because that patient had been dead and buried in the cemetery before the investigation.


3.  In doing so,  Mr. Schnier committed Frauds No. 1 , No. 2 , and No. 3.
If you get a copy of the transcript of the Judicial Review Hearing from the California Medical Board and Dept. of Justice you will verify that this patient discussed by Mr. Schnier is found on  Page  56  lines  16 - 17.


Attorney Schnier made a wrongful criminal deception,  willful and deliberate misrepresentation of facts and intentional perversion of truth.


4.  A second patient who was dead and buried in the cemetery was presented by the hospital witness,  Dr. Leonard  A.  Brant.  Mr. Schnier asked him questions about the patient.  This second patient is documented in the transcript of the Judicial Review Hearing :


Page  59  lines  22 - 24 :  Discussion of the hospital care of the patient two years before the established six months of monitoring period.


Page  60  lines  21 - 22 :  Discussion of the hospital care of the patient one and two years before the monitoring period.


Page  61  lines  6 - 9  :  " The patient died before the six months monitoring or Hospital investigation of Dr.  Lino  Dial. "


Page  62  lines  15 - 28 :  " The Utilization Review Committee was critical of Dr. Dial's utilization over the course of several years ( six years actually, since Dr. Dial complained about the Falsification of Hospital patient medical record for money, performed by Dr. Robert S. Blum, the Neurosurgeon ).  The evidence :
See the One - Page Summaries  numbers  One ,  two  and  three.


Fraud No. 4 :  The second patient was not hospitalized during the six months monitoring or Hospital investigation of Dr. Lino  Dial.


Fraud No. 5 :  Mr. Schnier said he had Hospital monitoring report.
How could this patient be monitored in the hospital ?  This patient was not even in the hospital.


Fraud No. 6 :  Mr. Schnier said that the Doctor who monitored this patient made and submitted a report.    That report must be a fraud. 


Evidence :    Page  8  lines  24 - 26 :  Mr. Schnier asked for and received 
monitoring reports from the doctors who monitored me.


To  be  continued.


The  end  for  now.