THIS IS A
DOCUMENTARY WRITTEN BY DR. LINO DIAL, A CALIFORNIA – LICENSED PRACTICING
PHYSICIAN AND THE VICTIM OF THE 53 CRIMES.
MT. PINATUBO – 13
( LINO DIAL
PAPERS – PART – 13 )
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 13
CONSPIRACY
TO HIDE A CRIME IS A FEDERAL CRIME.
REFERENCES
:
1.
THE “ LOS ANGELES MADAM “ HEIDI FLEISS, WAS
CONVICTED IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN LOS ANGELES IN 1997 FOR CONSPIRACY TO HIDE
A CRIME. THIS WAS WELL – PUBLICIZED.
2.
THE CONSPIRACY TO HIDE A CRIME IN THE
HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA WAS PRESENTED
IN MT. PINATUBO NUMBERS 1 TO 12 OR IN THE LINO
DIAL PAPERS – PARTS 1 TO 12.
QUESTION :
IS
CONSPIRACY TO HIDE A CRIME ANY DIFFERENT IN LOS ANGELES THAN IN VALLEJO,
CALIFORNIA ?
THE CRIMES
COMMITTED BY LEONARD A.
BRANT, M.D.
DR. BRANT
IS A CALIFORNIA – LICENSED PRACTICING PHYSICIAN.
DR. BRANT’S
SPECIALTY IS SURGERY : DISEASES OF THE
URINARY SYSTEM.
DR. BRANT
WAS THE CHIEF OF THE HOSPITAL MEDICAL STAFF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WHICH DECIDES
INVESTI-GATIONS OF DOCTORS IN THE HOSPITAL.
DR. BRANT
DID NOT INVESTIGATE HIMSELF.
DR. BRANT
TOLD LIES AND FALSEHOODS ABOUT ME. HE
INVESTIGATED ME.
DR. BRANT
WAS NOT REPORTED TO THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD.
DR. BRANT
WAS NOT REPORTED TO THE JUSTICE DEPT.
DR. BRANT
WAS NOT PROSECUTED FOR HIS CRIMES.
DR. BRANT
COMMITTED HIS CRIMES DURING A JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING.
EVIDENCE
: TRANSCRIPT OF THE JUDICIAL HEARING.
1.
PAGE
53 LINES 9 – 10 :
“ THE NEXT WITNESS FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS DR. LEONARD BRANT”
2.
PAGE
53 LINES 11 – 12 :
“ WOULD THE COURT REPORTER PLEASE SWEAR DR. BRANT IN ? “
3.
PAGE
53 LINES 14 – 15 :
LEONARD BRANT, M.D. BEING FIRST DULY SWORN IN TESTIFIED AS FOLLOWS :
4.
PAGE
53 LINE 25 : “
I AM THE CHIEF OF STAFF.”
5.
PAGE
53 LINE 28 : “
I’M THE CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.”
6.
PAGE
79 LINES 12 – 13 :
“ DR. BRANT, YOU MENTIONED CARDIAC SEIZURE AS A DIAGNOSIS MADE BY DR.
DIAL IN THE MEDICAL RECORD.”
7.
PAGE
79 LINES 15 – 16 :
“ YES “, THAT’S ONE OF THE HE ( DR. DIAL ) CONSIDERED. DR. BRANT ACCUSED DR. DIAL OF MAKING A
DIAGNOSIS OF CARDIAC SEIZURE IN THE HOSPITAL MEDICAL PATIENT RECORD.
8.
PAGE
79 LINES 17 – 28 :
THE MEDICAL RECORD WAS READ. IT
WAS PROVEN BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT THAT THE ACCUSATION OF DR. BRANT WAS
FALSE. IT WAS NOT IN THE MEDICAL
RECORD. DR. BRANT MADE IT UP. HE FABRICATED IT, A PRODUCT OF HIS
IMAGINATION.
9.
PAGE
83 LINE 12 :
WRONG OR INAPPROPRIATE INTERPRETATION OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAM OR EKG MADE
BY DR. LINO DIAL.
10.PAGE 83 LINE
13 – 15 : DR. DIAL DID NOT
READ THE EKG OR CARDIOGRAM.
11.PAGE 83 LINE
22 : DR. BRANT KEPT LOOKING IN
DR. DIAL’S PROGRESS NOTES. HOPING THAT
HE WOULD FIND DR. DIAL’S WRONG INTERPRETATION OF THE EKG.
12.PAGE 84 LINES
14 – 15 : “ IS THAT AN INTER-
PRETATION
OF THE CARDIOGRAM ? “
13.PAGE 85 LINES
11 - 13 : “ I DON’T SEE ANY EVIDENCE THAT DR. DIAL MADE
AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM.”
CONCLUSION
:
WHILE UNDER OATH, ON THE WITNESS STAND,
DR. BRANT MADE TWO ACCUSATIONS AGAINST DR. DIAL. BOTH ACCUSATIONS WERE PROVEN FALSE BEYOND ANY
REASONABLE DOUBT. BOTH ACCUSATIONS WERE
PRODUCTS OF HIS IMAGINATION. HE MADE
THEM UP.
DR. BRANT
JUST COMMITTED THE CRIMES OF PERJURY,
TWO
TIMES !!
THE NEXT
POWER POINT PRESENTATION OR SLIDE SHOW ON YOU TUBE IS :
MT. PINATUBO – 14.
( LINO DIAL
PAPERS – PART – 14 )
( ONE –
PAGE SUMMARY NO.
14 )
THE END.
June 10,
2012
MT. PINATUBO
PRODUCTIONS PRESENTS
MT. PINATUBO – 14
( LINO DIAL
PAPERS – PART – 14 )
( ONE –
PAGE SUMMARY NO.
14 )
TITLE
: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES
THIS IS A
DOCUMENTARY WRITTEN BY DR. LINO DIAL, A CALIFORNIA – LICENSED PRACTICING
PHYSICIAN AND VICTIM OF THE 53 CRIMES.
LOCATION OF
THE CRIMES : DURING A JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING HELD ACCORDING TO LAW IN THE
CITY OF VALLEJO, IN SOLANO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WITNESSES
TO THE CRIMES : NINE ( 9 ) PHYSICIANS WHO ARE LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN
CALIFORNIA. THEY SAW THE CRIMES AS THESE
WERE BEING COMMITTED.
THE
OFFICIAL COURT TRANSCRIBER INSTANTLY RECORDED THE CRIMES IN THE 100 – PAGE
TRANSCRIPT OF THAT SAME JUDICIAL REVIEW
HEARING.
THE
EVIDENCE : THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE
HEARING.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 14
CONSPIRACY
TO HIDE A CRIME IS A FEDERAL CRIME.
REFERENCES
:
1.
THE “ LOS ANGELES MADAM “, HEIDI FLEISS , WAS CONVICTED IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT
IN LOS ANGELES, IN 1997 FOR CONSPIRACY TO HIDE A CRIME. THIS WAS WELL – PUBLICIZED.
2.
THE CONSPIRACY TO HIDE CRIMES IN THE HOSPITAL
COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA WAS PRESENTED IN MT.
PINATUBO – 1 TO 13.
QUESTION :
IS
CONSPIRACY TO HIDE A CRIME ANY DIFFERENT IN LOS ANGELES THAN IN VALLEJO,
CALIFORNIA ?
THE CRIMES
OF ATTORNEY STEVEN V. SCHNIER OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
ATTORNEY SCHNIER IS A GRADUATE OF STANFORD
UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL IN CALIFORNIA. HE
HAS A B.S. DEGREE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. HE IS AMONG THE BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA (1995 – 2011 ).
NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA SUPER LAWYERS ( 2006- 2011 ).
ATTORNEY
SCHNIER IS A SENIOR PARTNER IN THE LAW FIRM OF
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
425 MARKET
STREET , 26TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105
TEL. 877 – 342 – 6766 ( TOLL FREE )
TEL. 415 – 777 – 3200 ; TEL.
415 – 442 – 3333 ; TEL. 415 – 995 – 5018 ; TEL. 415-995-5075 ;
415-925-8400.
MR. SCHNIER
COMMITTED HIS CRIMES DURING A JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING WHICH WAS HELD ACCORDING
TO LAW IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO, CALIF.
THERE WERE NINE ( 9 ) CALIFORNIA – LICENSED PRACTICING PHYSICIANS WHO SAW
AND HEARD MR. SCHNIER WHILE HE WAS COMMITTING THE CRIMES OF FRAUDS AND
CONSPIRACY.
THE
OFFICIAL COURT TRANSCRIBER INSTANTLY RECORDED THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY MR.
SCHNIER IN THE 100 – PAGE TRANSCRIPT OF
THAT HEARING. COPY OF THE 100 – PAGE
TRANSCRIPT AND OTHER EVIDENCES WERE SUBMITTED TO THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD
DURING INVESTIGATIVE HEARINGS INSIDE THE OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD
ON FEBRUARY 26, 2008 AND JUNE 24 , 2008.
THE
EVIDENCE : TRANSCRIPT OF THAT HEARING.
1.
IT SHOULD BE STATED AT THE OUTSET ( START )
THAT MR. SCHNIER WAS THE ATTORNEY FOR THE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL STAFF DURING THE
JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING.
2.
THE HOSPITAL, MEDICAL STAFF AND MR. SCHNIER
HAD ABOUT SIX MONTHS TO PREPARE FOR THE JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING.
3.
DURING THOSE SIX MONTHS, THE HOSPITAL,
MEDICAL STAFF AND ATTORNEY SCHNIER CONSPIRED AND AGREED TO PREPARE FALSE
EVIDENCES AGAINST ME.
4.
THESE FALSE , DECEPTIVE AND FRAUDULENT
EVIDENCES WERE SUBMITTED BY MR. SCHNIER AS EXHIBITS NO. 1 THROUGH 14 AND ACCEPTED AS EVIDENCE DURING
THE JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING (AS NOTED ON
PAGE 3 LINES
15 – 16 OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING.).
5.
IN THE ONE – PAGE SUMMARY NUMBERS 11, 12, 13,
THE LIES , DECEITS , FRAUDS , FALSEHOODS, DECEPTIONS AND MISREPRESENTATION OF
FACTS THAT CAME OUT OF THE LYING LIPS AND DECEITFUL TONGUES OF DR. PETER E.
PHILBIN , AND DR. LEONARD A. BRANT WERE PRESENTED.
6.
AFTER THE JUDICIAL HEARING, THE HOSPITAL AND
MEDICAL STAFF DECLARED IN WRITING AND OFFICIALLY PROCLAIMED THAT THIS JUDICIAL
HEARING NEVER TOOK PLACE OR IT DID NOT HAPPEN BECAUSE DR. LINO DIAL CANCELED IT.
7.
THE EVIDENCES THAT THE JUDICIAL HEARING WAS
HELD ARE THE 100 – PAGE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT HEARING AND DR. DIAL WAS PRESENT AT
THAT SAME HEARING. DR. DIAL WAS RECORDED
AS SPEAKING IN MANY PAGES OF THE TRANSCRIPT.
QUESTION :
HOW COULD
DR. DIAL CANCEL THE HEARING WHICH HE ATTENDED ?
THE NEXT
POWER POINT PRESENTATION OR SLIDE SHOW ON YOU TUBE IS :
MT. PINATUBO – 15.
( LINO DIAL
PAPERS – PART – 15 )
( ONE –
PAGE SUMMARY NO.
15 )
THIS WILL
BE AVAILABLE ON DVD IN ONE OR TWO MONTHS.
THE END.
June 11,
2012
TITLE
: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES
MT. PINATUBO
PRODUCTIONS PRESENTS
THE LINO
DIAL PAPERS – PART – 15
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 15
CONSPIRACY
TO HIDE A CRIME IS A FEDERAL CRIME
REFERENCES
:
1.
CONSPIRACY :
U.S. CODE TITLE 18
SECTION 241
2.
CONSPIRACY :
CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL CODE
TITLE 7 ,
CHAPTER 8 , SECTION
182
3.
CONSPIRACY :
FRAUD : OPERATION REZONE :
FBI INVESTIGATION IN 1993 TO 1995 , REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS AND LOCAL
OFFICERS IN FRESNO, CA WERE CONVICTED OF FRAUDS, ETC.
4.
CONSPIRACY :
THE “ LOS ANGELES MADAM “ INVESTIGATED IN 1993 – 1997 AND CONVICTED IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT.
5.
CONSPIRACY TO HIDE CRIMES IN THE HOSPITAL
COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIF.
WERE PRESENTED IN MT. PINATUBO – 1 TO 14 POWER POINT PRESENTATION
OR SLIDE SHOW.
QUESTION :
IS
CONSPIRACY TO HIDE A CRIME ANY DIFFERENT IN FRESNO AND LOS ANGELES THAN IN
VALLEJO, CA ?
THE CRIMES
COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY STEVEN V. SCHNIER OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105.
ATTORNEY
SCHNIER IS A GRADUATE OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL IN CALIFORNIA. HE HAS A
B.S. DEGREE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. HE IS AMONG THE BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA (1995-
2011). NORTHERN CALIFORNIA SUPER
LAWYERS(2006- 2011).
ATTORNEY
SCHNIER IS A SENIOR PARTNER IN THE LAW FIRM OF
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
425 MARKET
STREET , 26TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105
TEL. 877 – 342 – 6766 ( TOLL FREE )
TEL. 415-777-3200 ; 415-442-3333 ; 415-995-5018
TEL. 415-995-5075 ; 415 – 925 – 8400
ATTORNEY
SCHNIER COMMITTED HIS CRIMES DURING A JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING WHICH WAS HELD
ACCORDING TO LAW IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA IN THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA.
THERE WERE
NINE ( 9 ) CALIFORNIA – LICENSED PRACTICING PHYSICIANS WHO SAW AND HEARD MR.
SCHNIER WHILE HE WAS COMMITTING THE CRIMES OF FRAUDS AND CONSPIRACY. THE OFFICIAL COURT TRANSCRIBER INSTANTLY
RECORDED THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY SCHNIER IN THE 100- PAGE TRANSCRIPT
OF THAT JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING.
COPY OF
THIS TRANSCRIPT, ALL 100 PAGES WERE SUBMITTED TO THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD.
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT :
NO
PROSECUTION OF THE 53 CRIMES.
EVIDENCE
: TRANSCRIPT OF THE JUDICIAL HEARING.
1.
PAGE
3 LINES 13 – 16 :
EXHIBITS NO. 1 TO 14 SUBMITTED BY ATTORNEY SCHNIER IN BEHALF OF THE
HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL STAFF. IT WAS
ALREADY PROVEN THAT THESE EXHIBITS CONTAIN LIES, FRAUDS, FALSEHOODS AND
DECEPTIONS AS NOTED IN MT. PINATUBO – 11
, 12 AND 13 .
2.
PAGE
4 LINES 19 – 22 :
DR. DIAL WAS SPEAKING: DR. DIAL ASKED FOR THE CRITERIA USED DURING THE
HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION OF DR. DIAL WAS DONE ONE YEAR BEFORE THE JUDICIAL
HEARING. NO CRITERIA WAS PROVIDED. ( NO CRITERIA MEANS THAT THE HOSPITAL
INVESTIGATION OF DR. DIAL WAS
BIASED AND PREJUDICED ).
3.
PAGE
5 LINES 12 – 13 :
HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION OF DR. DIAL’S PATIENT CARE WAS DONE ONE YEAR
AGO. IF CRITERIA WAS AVAILABLE THEN , IT
SHOULD BE AVAILABLE NOW. DO YOU HAVE THE
CRITERIA ? NO CRITERIA MEANS THERE WAS
BIAS AND PREJUDICE.
4.
PAGE
5 LINES 20 – 22 :
THERE WERE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE OF DR. DIAL , BUT NO
CRITERIA. ( ANYBODY CAN ASK QUESTIONS
BUT QUESTIONS ARE NOT CRITERIA ).
5.
PAGE
7 LINES 27 – 28 :
AND PAGE 8 LINE 1
: “ “THERE WERE QUESTIONS , IN A SENSE
, THEY ARE, THEY ARE , IF YOU WILL , THE
CRITERIA.”
6.
PAGE
8 LINES 7 – 23 :
THE MONITORING PROGRAM OR HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION OF DR. DIAL WAS
INSTITUTED BY THE MEDICAL STAFF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TO LAST FOR SIX
MONTHS. THIS WAS DONE ONE YEAR BEFORE
THE JUDICIAL HEARING.
7.
PAGE
8 LINES 24 – 25 :
DR. DIAL ASKED ATTORNEY SCHNIER :
“ DID YOU ASK FOR OR RECEIVE MONITORING REPORTS ?” ATTORNEY SCHNIER ANSWERED : “ YES .”
THE NEXT
POWER POINT PRESENTATION OR SLIDE SHOW ON YOU TUBE :
MT. PINATUBO – 16.
( LINO DIAL
PAPERS – PART – 16 )
( ONE –
PAGE SUMMARY NO.
16 )
THIS SHOULD
BE AVAILABLE IN ONE OR TWO MONTHS. IT IS ALSO SEVEN MINUTES OR LESS IN DURATION.
THE END.
June 11,
2012
TITLE
: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES
AUTHOR
: DR. LINO DIAL, VICTIM OF THE 53
CRIMES.
MT. PINATUBO
PRODUCTIONS PRESENTS
THE LINO
DIAL PAPERS – PART – 16
( ONE –
PAGE SUMMARY NO.
16)
CONSPIRACY
TO HIDE A CRIME IS A FEDERAL CRIME.
REFERENCES
:
1.
CONSPIRACY :
U.S. CODE TITLE 18
SECTION 241
2.
CONSPIRACY :
CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL
CODE TITLE 7 ,
CHAPTER 8 , SECTION
182
3.
CONSPIRACY :
FRAUD : OPERATION REZONE : FBI
INVESTIGATION IN 1993 – 1995 , REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS AND LOCAL
OFFICIALS IN FRESNO, CA WERE CONVICTED OF FRAUDS, ETC.
4.
CONSPIRACY : THE “ LOS ANGELES MADAM”, HEIDI FLEISS
WAS CONVICTED IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT.
5.
CONSPIRACY TO HIDE CRIMES IN THE HOSPITAL
COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIF. WERE PRESENTED IN MT. PINATUBO – NO. 1 TO 15.
QUESTION :
IS
CONSPIRACY TO HIDE A CRIME ANY DIFFERENT IN FRESNO AND LOS ANGELES THAN IN
VALLEJO, CA. ?
THE CRIMES
OF ATTORNEY STEVEN V. SCHNIER
ATTORNEY SCHNIER
COMMITTED HIS CRIMES DURING A JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING WHICH WAS HELD ACCORDING
TO LAW IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO, CALIF.
THERE WERE
NINE ( 9 ) CALIFORNIA – LICENSED PRACTICING PHYSICIANS WHO SAW AND HEARD
ATTORNEY SCHNIER WHILE HE WAS COMMITTING THE CRIMES OF FRAUDS AND CONSPIRACY.
THE
OFFICIAL COURT TRANSCRIBER INSTANTLY RECORDED THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY MR.
SCHNIER IN THE 100 – PAGE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT HEARING.
COPY OF THE
TRANSCRIPT, ALL 100 PAGES WERE SUBMITTED TO THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD.
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT :
NO
PROSECUTION OF THE 53 CRIMES.
EVIDENCE
: TRANSCRIPT OF THE JUDICIAL HEARING.
THE LAST ITEM IN MT. PINATUBO – 15 IS CONNECTED TO THE NEXT TEN CRIMES OF
FRAUDS COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY STEVEN V.
SCHNIER OF SAN FRANCISCO, CA.
1.
PAGE
8 LINES 24 – 25 :
DR. DIAL ASKED MR. SCHNIER : “ DID YOU ASK FOR OR RECEIVE MONITORING
REPORTS FROM DOCTORS WHO MONITORED ME ? “
2.
PAGE
8 LINE 26 :
MR. SCHNIER ANSWERED: “YES”.
3.
PAGE
8 LINES 27 – 28 :
DR. DIAL ASKED MR. SCHNIER AGAIN : “ WERE THERE REPORTS SUBMITTED BY THE
DOCTORS ? “
4.
PAGE
9 LINE 1 :
MR. SCHNIER ANSWERED: “YES.”
THE SIX
MONTH PERIOD OF HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION
OF DR. DIAL WAS NOTED IN MT. PINATUBO –
15 OR IN THE ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 15.
DURING THE
HEARING MR. SCHNIER PRESENTED A PATIENT WHO WAS SUPPOSEDLY ADMITTED OR
HOSPITALIZED DURING THE SIX MONTHS OF HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION OF DR.
LINO DIAL.
FRAUD NO.
1 : ON EXAMINING THE HOSPITAL PATIENT MEDICAL
RECORD, IT WAS REVEALED THAT THIS PATIENT HAD BEEN DEAD AND BURIED IN THE
CEMETERY FOR ONE YEAR BEFORE THE HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION.
SO THIS
PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED.
THIS IS
OBVIOUSLY A FRAUD, A FALSEHOOD, A DECEPTION, FALSITY AND MISREPRESENTATION OF
FACTS.
FRAUD NO.
2 : I ASKED MR. SCHNIER TWO TIMES WHETHER HE
ASKED FOR AND RECEIVED MONITORING REPORTS.
MR. SCHNIER ANSWERED YES , TWO TIMES.
HE LIED OR DID NOT TELL THE TRUTH
OR SPOKE FALSEHOOD, DECEPTION, FALSITY AND PERVERSION OF TRUTH TWO TIMES OR
TWICE. THE REASON :
THE PATIENT
WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED AT ALL. THE PATIENT
HAD BEEN DEAD AND BURIED IN THE CEMETERY FOR A YEAR. THIS IS ANOTHER INTENTIONAL FRAUD.
FRAUD NO.
3 : MR.
SCHNIER SAID HE RECEIVED A MEDICAL MONITORING REPORT FROM THE
DOCTOR.
ATTORNEY
SCHNIER TOLD A LIE, A FALSEHOOD, FRAUD, DECEPTION, MISREPRESENTATION OF FACTS,
FALSITY, PERVERSION OF TRUTH AND INTENTIONAL FALSIFICATION FOR THE THIRD
TIME BECAUSE THAT DOCTOR COULD
NOT HAVE EXAMINED AND MADE A
MEDICAL REPORT ON A PATIENT WHO
WAS NOT IN THE HOSPITAL.
THE PATIENT
WAS ALREADY DEAD AND IN THE CEMETERY.
THIS IS OBVIOUSLY AN INTENTIONAL FALSIFICATION ON THE PART OF MR.
SCHNIER.
THE NEXT POWER POINT PRESENTATION OR SLIDE SHOW
ON YOU TUBE IS :
MT. PINATUBO – 17.
( LINO DIAL
PAPERS – PART – 17 )
( ONE –
PAGE SUMMARY NO. 17
).
THIS WILL
BE AVAILABLE IN ONE OR TWO MONTHS, ON
DVD OR SLIDES.
THE END.
June 11, 2011
TITLE
: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES
AUTHOR
: DR. LINO DIAL, VICTIM OF THE 53
CRIMES.
MT. PINATUBO
PRODUCTIONS PRESENTS
MT. PINATUBO – 17
( LINO DIAL
PAPERS – PART – 17 )
( ONE –
PAGE SUMMARY NO.
17 )
CONTINUATION
OF THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY STEVEN
V. SCHNIER OF SAN FRANCISCO, CA.
PROCEDURES
FOLLOWED BY HOSPITAL MEDICAL STAFF IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO TERMINATE
PHYSICIAN’S STAFF PRIVILEGES MUST BE FUNDAMENTALLY FAIR.
REFERENCE :
SUCKLE VS.
MADISON GENERAL HOSPITAL.
362 F.
SUPP. 1196 , AFFIRMED 499 F.
2D. 1364
EVIDENCES :
1.
IN THE
MT. PINATUBO – 15 OR ONE – PAGE
SUMMARY NO. 15 ,
PAGE 8 LINES
7 – 23 : THE MONITORING PROGRAM
( HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION OF DR. LINO
DIAL ) WAS INSTITUTED BY THE HOSPITAL MEDICAL STAFF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
TO LAST FOR SIX MONTHS. IN OTHER WORDS ,
THEY MADE THE RULE THAT PATIENTS I
ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL DURING THOSE SIX MONTHS WILL BE MONITORED , EXAMINED
OR INVESTIGATED.
2.
IN THE
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY NO. 16 , THE
HOSPITAL MEDICAL STAFF AND THEIR ATTORNEY BROKE OR DID NOT FOLLOW THEIR OWN
RULE. THE EVIDENCE FOR NOT FOLLOWING
THEIR OWN RULE WAS WHEN MR. SCHNIER PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED A PATIENT WHO WAS
NOT HOSPITALIZED AT ALL DURING THE ESTABLISHED SIX MONTHS OF MONITORING
PERIOD. THE PATIENT HAD BEEN DEAD AND
BURIED IN THE CEMETERY BEFORE THE HOSPITAL MONITORING OR INVESTIGATION BEGAN.
3.
IN SO DOING , MR. SCHNIER COMMITTED THE
CRIMES OF FRAUD NO. 1 ,
NO. 2 AND NO. 3. IF YOU GET A
COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING FROM THE CALIFORNIA
MEDICAL BOARD AND DEPT. OF JUSTICE , YOU WILL VERIFY THAT THIS PATIENT
DISCUSSED BY MR. SCHNIER IS FOUND
ON PAGE 56
LINES 16 – 17. ATTORNEY SCHNIER MADE A WRONGFUL CRIMINAL
DECEPTION, WILLFUL , DELIBERATE MISREPRESENTATION OF FACTS AND INTENTIONAL
PERVERSION OF TRUTH.
4.
A
SECOND PATIENT WHO WAS DEAD AND BURIED IN THE CEMETERY BEFORE THE HOSPITAL
MONITORING OR INVESTIGATION BEGAN WAS PRESENTED BY THE HOSPITAL WITNESS, DR. LEONARD
A. BRANT. MR.
SCHNIER ASKED HIM QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PATIENT. THIS SECOND PATIENT IS DOCUMENTED IN THE
TRANSCRIPT OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING :
PAGE 59 LINES 22 – 24 :
DISCUSSION OF THE HOSPITAL CARE OF THE PATIENT TWO YEARS BEFORE THE
MONITORING PERIOD.
PAGE 60
LINES 21 – 22 : DISCUSSION OF THE HOSPITAL CARE OF THE
PATIENT ONE YEAR AND TWO YEARS BEFORE THE MONITORING PERIOD BEGAN.
PAGE 61
LINES 6 – 9 : “ THIS PATIENT DIED BEFORE THE SIX MONTHS OF
MONITORING OR HOSPITAL INVESTI-GATION OF DR.
LINO DIAL.
PAGE 62 LINES 15 – 28 :
“ THE UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE WAS CRITICAL OF DR. DIAL’S
UTILIZATION OVER THE COURSE OF SEVERAL YEARS ( ACTUALLY SIX YEARS , SINCE DR.
DIAL COMPLAINED ABOUT THE FALSIFICATION OF HOSPITAL PATIENT MEDICAL RECORD TO
GET MONEY FROM THE OLD WOMAN, PERFORMED BY ROBERT S.
BLUM , M.D. , THE NEUROSURGEON.).
THE
EVIDENCE : MT. PINATUBO – 1 , 2 , AND 3
OR THE ONE – PAGE SUMMARIES NUMBERS ONE, TWO AND THREE.
FRAUD NO.
4 : THE SECOND PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED
DURING THE SIX MONTHS MONITORING OR HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION OF DR. LINO
DIAL.
FRAUD NO.
5 : MR. SCHNIER SAID THAT HE HAD OBTAINED A
HOSPITAL MONITORING REPORT. HOW COULD
THIS PATIENT BE MONITORED IN THE HOSPITAL ?
HE WAS NOT EVEN IN THE HOSPITAL .
FRAUD NO.
6 : MR.
SCHNIER SAID THAT THE DOCTOR WHO MONITORED THIS PATIENT MADE AND
SUBMITTED A MEDICAL REPORT. THAT
REPORT MUST BE
A FRAUD , A FALSITY , A DECEPTION
AND A FALSEHOOD.
THE
EVIDENCE :
PAGE 8
LINES 24 – 26 : MR.
SCHNIER ASKED FOR AND RECEIVED MONITORING REPORTS FROM THE DOCTORS WHO
MONITORED ME.
THE NEXT
POWER POINT PRESENTATION OR SLIDE SHOW ON YOU TUBE :
MT. PINATUBO – 18
( LINO DIAL
PAPERS – PART – 18 )
( ONE –
PAGE SUMMARY NO.
18 )
THIS WILL
BE AVAILABLE IN DVD OR SLIDES IN ONE OR TWO
MONTHS.
THE END
JUNE 12,
2012
TITLE
: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES
STANDARD
FORM FOR THE POWER POINT OR SLIDE SHOW
PRESENTATION
ON YOU TUBE / DVD.
INTRODUCTION
:
WHEN THE
SCREEN OPENS AS IN THE FIRST SLIDE :
ONE HEARS
MUSIC : TINIKLING, INSTRUMENTAL , RONDALLA
STRING INSTRUMENTS.
ONE SEES LARGE WHITE LETTERS SUPERIMPOSED ON DEEP
BLUE SKY OR SEA :
MT. PINATUBO
PRODUCTIONS PRESENTS
THE LINO
DIAL PAPERS :
HOSPITAL
COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES.
THIS IS A
DOCUMENTARY WRITTEN BY DR. LINO DIAL , A CALIFORNIA – LICENSED PRACTICING
PHYSICIAN AND VICTIM OF THE 53 CRIMES.
A TWENTY – FIVE PART POWER POINT PRESENTATION
OR SLIDE SHOW ON YOU TUBE / DVD , WILL BE AVAILABLE IN ONE OR TWO MONTHS. EACH PART OR PRESENTATION IS SEVEN MINUTES OR
LESS IN DURATION.
BACKGROUND
MUSIC CONTINUES TO PLAY : INSTRUMENTAL ,
TINIKLING , RONDALLA.
THE FIRST
SLIDE OR OPENING SCENE :
PROVIDED BY
CLIP ART OR PHOTO STOCK.
WE ALREADY
HAVE THE LOVELY PICTURE :
BEACH ,
COCONUT TREE , WHITE SANDS , DEEP BLUE SKY AND SEA, BRIGHT SUNLIGHT.
THE TEXT OR
LARGE WHITE LETTERS ARE SUPERIMPOSED ON DEEP BLUE SKY. AT THE SAME TIME THE STRING INSTRUMENTS PLAY
TINIKLING.
THE CAPTION
OR NARRATION :
BOTOLAN BEACH ,
ZAMBALES , PHILIPPINES ,
IN THE
VICINITY OF MOUNT PINATUBO WHERE
DR. LINO
DIAL WAS BORN AND RAISED.
MT. PINATUBO, A VOLCANO WHICH ERUPTED IN 1991,
LED TO THE CLOSURE OF CLARK U.S. AIR
FORCE BASE AND SUBIC BAY
U.S. NAVAL BASE.
BASICALLY
THERE IS ONLY ONE SCENE,
THE BEAUTIFUL
BOTOLAN BEACH IN THE PROVINCE OF
ZAMBALES IN NORTHWESTERN PHILIPPINES.
BLUE SKY,
DEEP BLUE
SEA, BRIGHT SUNSHINE , NO CLOUDS ABOVE.
YOU CAN
ALMOST FEEL THE BALMY BREEZE IN A TROPICAL
PARADISE.
MT. PINATUBO SLIDES ARE PRESENTED FROM 1 TO 25 .
EACH PRESENTATION IS SEVEN MINUTES OR LESS.
THIS IS
DONE IN THIS MANNER :
A SAIL BOAT WITH MULTI – COLORED SAIL MOVES
ALONG THE SEASHORE CARRYING OR TOWING A LARGE BANNER WITH BIG, LARGE , REALLY
HUGE LETTERS . IN A SENSE THESE ARE THE
SLIDES , LIKE FLOATS ON A PARADE.
PEOPLE ON
THE SHORE ARE WATCHING THE BOAT AND THEY CAN READ THE TEXT WITHOUT BINOCULAR OR
TELESCOPE.
MT. PINATUBO
PRESENTATIONS :
BRIEF BACKGROUND :
ELEVEN SLIDES ARE PRESENTED.
POSTED ON
THE INTERNET.
MT. PINATUBO – 1 TO 4 : POSTED ON
MAY 24, 2012.
MT. PINATUBO -
5 : POSTED ON MAY
25, 2012
MT. PINATUBO -
6 : POSTED ON MAY
25, 2012
MT. PINATUBO – 7 TO 12: POSTED ON JUNE
4, 2012
MT. PINATUBO -
13
MT. PINATUBO -
14
MT. PINATUBO – 15
MT. PINATUBO -
16
MT. PINATUBO -
17
MT. PINATUBO -
18
JUNE 12,
2012
MT. PINATUBO
PRODUCTIONS PRESENTS
MT. PINATUBO – 18
( LINO DIAL
PAPERS – PART – 18 )
( ONE –
PAGE SUMMARY NO.
18 )
U. S. SUPREME
COURT DECISION : 1966
REVOCATION
PROCEEDINGS “ HOSPITAL MEDICAL PRIVILEGES “ WERE SIMILAR TO A CRIMINAL CASE.
REFERENCE :
SHIVELY VS.
STEWART ( 1966 )
65 CAL.
2D. 475 , 55
CAL. RPTR. 217
CONTINUATION
OF THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY
ATTORNEY STEVEN
V. SCHNIER OF SAN FRANCISCO, CA.
1.
IN THIS ONE – PAGE SUMMARY NO. 18
: THE CRIMES OF FRAUDS NO. 7 , 8 , AND 9 ARE PRESENTED. THESE TOOK PLACE DURING A JUDICIAL REVIEW
HEARING AND THE EVIDENCE IS THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT HEARING.
2.
THE HOSPITAL , MEDICAL STAFF AND ATTORNEY
SCHNIER , PREPARED AND SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE DURING THE HEARING , INTENTIONAL
DECEPTIONS, LIES , DECEITS, FRAUDS , FALSEHOODS, FALSITIES, MISREPRESENTATION
OF FACTS AND PERVERSION OF TRUTH.
THE
EVIDENCE : TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING.
1.
PAGE
12 LINES 14 – 26 :
DR. PETER E.
PHILBIN WAS SWORN IN AS WITNESS FOR THE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL STAFF
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.
2.
PAGE
14 LINES 24 – 28 :
“ THIS IS A PATIENT THAT WAS NOT SEEN DURING THE PERIOD OF MONITORING ? “
3.
PAGE
15 LINES 1 – 3 :
ATTORNEY SCHNIER ANSWERED : “
THIS WAS A PATIENT THAT WAS SEEN APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR BEFORE THE MONITORING
BEGAN. “
4.
CRIME
OF FRAUD NO. 7
: ATTORNEY SCHNIER ADMITTED DURING THE
JUDICIAL HEARING THAT THIS PATIENT WAS NOT SEEN DURING THE SIX MONTHS OF MONITORING
OR INVESTIGATION PERIOD. ( FOR THAT
MATTER , IT COULD HAVE BEEN TEN OR TWENTY OR MORE YEARS BEFORE THE MONITORING
BEGAN ).
SO, WHAT KIND OF MONITORING WAS MR. SCHNIER
TALKING ABOUT ? THIS PATIENT WAS NOT
EVEN IN THE HOSPITAL.
THIS IS
OBVIOUSLY A LIE , A FRAUD, A FALSEHOOD,
INTENTIONAL
DECEPTION, PERVERSION OF TRUTH.
5.
CRIME OF FRAUD NO. 8
: RECALL THAT ON PAGE
8 LINES 24 – 26 OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THIS JUDICIAL
REVIEW HEARING, MR. SCHNIER SAID THAT HE ASKED FOR AND RECEIVED HOSPITAL
MONITORING MEDICAL REPORTS.
HOW COULD
THIS PATIENT BE MONITORED IN THE HOSPITAL WHEN HE WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED DURING
THE MONITORING OR INVESTIGATION PERIOD ?
THIS IS
ANOTHER WILLFUL, DELIBERATE INTENTIONAL WRONGFUL DECEPTION OR PERVERSION OF
TRUTH TO DECEIVE OTHERS.
6.
CRIME
OF FRAUD NO. 9
: MR. SCHNIER SAID THAT HE RECEIVED A HOSPITAL MONITORING REPORT FROM
THE DOCTOR WHO MONITORED ME. FIRST OF
ALL , THE DOCTOR HAD TO EXAMINE THE PATIENT BEFORE HE COULD MAKE A REPORT.
BUT THIS
PATIENT WAS NOT EVEN HOSPITALIZED DURING THE MONITORING PERIOD !!
HOW COULD
THE DOCTOR EXAMINE HIM ? MUCH LESS MAKE
A MEDICAL MONITORING REPORT.
THIS IS
ANOTHER GLARING EXAMPLE OF INTENTIONAL
FALSIFICATION ON THE PART OF THE HOSPITAL , MEDICAL STAFF EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE AND ATTORNEY SCHNIER. THIS IS
JUST ONE OF THOSE FRAUDS COMMITTED DURING THE JUDICIAL HEARING IN THE CITY OF
VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA.
THE NEXT
POWER POINT PRESENTATION OR SLIDE SHOW ON YOU TUBE / DVD IS :
MT. PINATUBO – 19.
( LINO DIAL
PAPERS PART – 19 )
( ONE –
PAGE SUMMARY NO. 19 )
THE END.
No comments:
Post a Comment