Thursday, April 12, 2012
Series of Fifty-three(53) Hospital Falsifications: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFOR...
Series of Fifty-three(53) Hospital Falsifications: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFOR...: TITLE : HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES BY : DR. LINO DIAL OUTLINE I CALIFORNIA MEDI...
Series of Fifty-three(53) Hospital Falsifications: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFOR...
Series of Fifty-three(53) Hospital Falsifications: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFOR...: TITLE : HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES BY : DR. LINO DIAL OUTLINE I CALIFORNIA MEDI...
Sunday, April 8, 2012
HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA
TITLE
: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES
BY
: DR.
LINO DIAL
OUTLINE
I CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD DECLARED IN
WRITING :
NO
CRIME COMMITTED BY HOSPITAL AND DOCTORS IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO,
CALIFORNIA. SO , NO PROSECUTION WAS
DONE.
II LIST OF 53 CRIMES COMMITTED BY HOSPITAL AND
DOCTORS IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA AND THE HOSPITAL COVER UP.
Previously
published in :
THE
BIGGEST CRIME : HOSPITAL AND DOCTORS
DECLARED IN WRITING: THE JUDICIAL
HEARING WHERE THE CRIMES TOOK PLACE DID NOT HAPPEN OR NEVER TOOK PLACE.
THE
EVIDENCES THAT THE JUDICIAL HEARING WAS HELD :
1. Judicial Hearing was held for three hours.
2. Nine ( 9 ) California physicians were present.
3. The official court transcriber instantly
recorded the 53 crimes in the 100 – page transcript of that Judicial Review
Hearing.
III REQUESTS FOR CRIMINAL ACTION.
Numerous requests for Criminal Action:
County, State, Federal levels.
IV REFERENCES :
Date
prepared : December 12, 2011.
Date
posted on the Internet : December 28,
2011 and Jan. 4, 2012.
TITLE
: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES
Author
: Dr. Lino Dial , I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 1.
DOCUMENTS
AND EVIDENCES ARE IN THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD AND DEPT. OF JUSTICE.
1. The California Medical Board declared in
writing and officially proclaimed that no violation of the Law was done by the
Hospital and Doctors in the City of Vallejo, in Solano County, California
that’s why no prosecution was done.
Reference :
I
have many copies of the letter from the California Medical Board to me stating
this fact .
2. The Hospital Cover Up enumerates and describes
in detail the crimes of Fraud , Perjury , Conspiracy , Obstruction of Justice,
and Violation of my Civil rights, Subornation of Perjury , etc.
3. These crimes were committed before , during ,
and after a Judicial Review Hearing held according to Law in Solano County,
California , witnessed by nine ( 9 ) California – licensed practicing
physicians and instantly recorded by the official court transcriber in the 100
= page transcript of that Judicial Review Hearing.
4. After the hearing , the Hospital and Medical
Staff declared in writing , that the Judicial Review Hearing never took place
or it did not happen. Their reasoning
appears to be : No hearing , No
crime. The Justice Dept. should
be notified again and again.
STEPS IN
THE HOSPITAL COVER
UP
1. DR.
ROBERT S. BLUM, intentionally , willfully and
deliberately falsified the hospital patient medical record of an old woman to
get money from her. Senior citizens are
usually poor and don’t have enough money.
2. DR. BLUM admitted in writing in the hospital medical
patient record that he did the crimes.
The Hospital and Medical Staff had to cover up
the actions, crimes of DR. BLUM because these are shameful , horrible ,
filthy , disgusting and despicable. The
Hospital and Medical Staff did not investigate
DR. BLUM. Instead they investigated Dr. Lino Dial , the physician of the old woman.
3. DR. ROBERT ZEFF , declared during an investigative
hearing in the California Medical Board office in Sacramento, CA that the
actions of DR. BLUM were not ethical and
not legal. This took place on February
26, 2008. Dr. Zeff was the Medical
Consultant for the Medical Board during that hearing. The hearing was tape – recorded by Mr. Robert
Sherer , the Senior Investigator of the California Medical Board.
CONSPIRACY
WAIVES STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS.
In
other words, Statutes of limitations do not apply when there is Conspiracy.
4. PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT :
NO PROSECUTION OF DR. BLUM.
5. Consequences of Hospital cover Up
: More
Crimes.
JUDICIAL
HEARING : RESULT OF FRAUDULENT HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION.
1. Conspiracy by Hospital and Medical
Staff to present false evidences during the Judicial Review Hearing. This is well – documented in the 100 – page
transcript of that hearing.
2. DR. PETER E.
PHILBIN lied under oath, on the witness stand, documented on pages
46 , 47 , 48 of the transcript of that Judicial Review Hearing.
3. DR. LEONARD A.
BRANT , lied under oath, on the witness stand, documented on pages
80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 of the transcript of that same Judicial
Review Hearing.
4. ATTORNEY STEVEN
V. SCHNIER of San Francisco,
California told lies , deceits , frauds,
misrepresentation of facts, falsehoods documented on pages
8 , 9 , 14 , 15 , 24 , 41 , 56 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 66 of the transcript of
that same hearing.
5. LAWSUIT IN CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT ,
in Solano County, Case No. 87291
against the Hospital and Doctors.
Dr. Leonard A. Brant
submitted three pages of false declarations during the court hearing in
Superior court. These were submitted as
evidence for the hospital by Attorney Thomas
E. Pfalzer, ESQ. of the Law firm of McNamara , Houston, Dodge et al , P.O.
Box 5288 , 1211
Newell Ave., suite 200
in Walnut Creek , California 94596.
Reference :
www.crimevictimspress.com
November 21 , 2011.
The
California Superior Court Decision on Case No. 87291 was based on lies ,
deceits, frauds. Decision was invalid ,
erroneous and should be changed.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 2.
Why
one – page ? Most people won’t or can’t
read anything over one page.
The
documents and evidences about the 53 crimes are in the California Medical Board
and Dept. of Justice. The California
Medical Board declared in writing and officially proclaimed that no violation of the Law was committed by
the Hospital and Doctors in the City of Vallejo, California , that’s why no
prosecution was done.
CONSPIRACY
WAIVES STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS.
In
other words , Statutes of limitations do not apply when there is Conspiracy.
Reference
:
Olmeda
, R. Conspiracy waives statutes of
limitations. Several guilty verdicts at
Criminal Prosecution of Officers of the Law, many years after committing the
crimes of Official Misconduct, Criminal Mischief , falsifying records in
Broward County, Florida. Sun Sentinel ,
December 25 , 2011.
DEFINITIONS
OF FRAUD AND COVER UP IN GOOGLE AND WIKIPEDIA.
FRAUD
IS Wrongful Criminal Deception ,
Willful deliberate Intentional Deception
, Perversion of Truth , for financial gain.
CALIFORNIA
CRIMINAL CODE OR PENAL CODE DEFINITION :
Title 7
: Of Crimes Against Public
Justice, Chapter 6, Section
134 : Fraud.
THE CRIMES OF DR. ROBERT
S. BLUM.
Dr. Blum is a California – licensed
practicing physician. His specialty is
Neurosurgery. He had an A. B. degree at
Dartmouth College in Hanover , New Hampshire ;
received his Doctor of Medicine degree in University of Rochester and
had training in Surgery in New York city , New York.
THIS
IS HOW DR. BLUM COMMITTED HIS CRIMES ( WELL – DOCUMENTED ) :
1. Dr. Lino
Dial admitted an old woman to the hospital.
2. Dr.
Blum examined the old woman without being asked to see her.
3. Dr.
Blum dictated a Surgical Consultation , his first sentence was : “ Dr.
Dial asked me to see the old woman .”
4. I am
Dr. Dial , I
never asked Dr.
Blum to see the old woman.
5. Dr. Blum admitted in his letter to the Chief of Staff
:
“ First , of course ,
there is the issue of whether or not Dr. Dial asked me to see the patient in
Consultation. He did not.”
6. Dr. Blum examined the old woman
without permission.
7. Dr. Blum examined the patient under
false pretenses.
8. Examining a person without permission
is assault and battery.
9. Dr. Blum told a lie, a fraud. Then he asked for money.
10. Dr. Blum sent a bill or charges to the
old woman, asking for money.
11. I told the old lady, Dr. Blum was
never asked to see her.
12. The
old lady refused to pay Dr. Blum for his unrequested, unsolicited and
unwanted medical services.
These are the reasons and
motives for the Hospital Cover Up by the Hospital and doctors in the City of
Vallejo, California.
References :
California Superior Court,
Solano County Case No. 87291.
Mr. Robert Sherer, Senior
Investigator, California Medical Board, Office of Investigative Services
2535 Capitol
Oaks Drive , suite
220
Sacramento,
California 95833
TITLE : HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CA
Author : Dr. Lino
Dial , I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 3.
Documents and evidences
about the 53 crimes were submitted to the California Medical Board in
Sacramento during two Investigative Hearings inside the Medical Board office on
February 26, 2008 and June 24, 2008.
Both hearings were tape-recorded by Mr. Robert Sherer, the Senior
Investigator of the California Medical Board.
In the recent Criminal
Prosecution of Michael Jackson’s physician, the prosecutor brilliantly
proclaimed the overwhelming evidences against the Doctor that he obtained a
guilty verdict ( seen on National Television ).
Conspiracy waives Statutes of limitations.
THE CASE AGAINST Dr.
ROBERT S. BLUM IS WORSE.
The lying lips and deceitful tongue of Dr.
Blum admitted in no uncertain terms , in the hospital patient medical record,
that he committed the crime.
In the hospital record, Dr. Blum
proclaimed from his own mouth that the Surgical Consultation he dictated was
false , a fraud and fraudulent at best because he admitted in writing that he
was never asked to see the old woman in consultation.
From his own mouth, Dr. Blum admitted that
what he did was wrong. It was a
mistake. Speaking in the future tense,
Dr. Blum declared for the record that he will not send a bill or charges to the
patient.
In so doing, Dr. Blum committed another crime
of fraud, dishonesty, and wrongful criminal deception for financial or personal
gain because when Dr. Blum said in writing that not send a bill or charges to
the patient , he had already sent the bill.
The simple undeniable fact is that the patient already received the bill
or charges for his unrequested , unsolicited and unwanted medical services.
THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD CLAIMED
THERE WAS NO VIOLATION OF THE LAW.
QUESTION :
THE QUESTION FOR TODAY , THE
YEAR OR THE CENTURY:
WHY
DID THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD DECLARE IN WRITING THAT NO VIOLATION OF THE LAW WAS COMMITTED BY
THE HOSPITAL AND DOCTORS IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA ?
The end
for now.
To
be continued.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 4.
IN
THE HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES , THERE ARE FOUR BASIC STEPS OR WE CAN CALL
THEM “ HOUSES “.
1. Step
No. 1 or
House No. 1.
The crimes of fraud , conspiracy and
robbery committed by Dr. Robert S. Blum.
Dr. Blum intentionally falsified the hospital patient medical record of
an old woman to rob
or steal money from her. The old lady received a bill or charges for
his unrequested , unsolicited , and unwanted medical services.
These
are documented in the One – Page Summaries No. 1, 2,
And No. 3.
Conspiracy
waives Statutes of Limitations.
Prosecutorial Misconduct :
No prosecution of these crimes.
ONE
– PAGE SUMMARY NO.
4 ( continued ) :
STEPS
IN THE HOSPITAL COVER UP :
2. Step
No. 2 or
House No. 2.
The Hospital and Doctors in the City of
Vallejo, California conspired to cover up the crimes of Dr. Blum because these
are shameful , horrible , filthy , disgusting and despicable. They decided not to investigate Dr.
Blum. Instead , they decided to investigate
Dr. Lino Dial , the physician of the old
woman. This led to the removal of the
job and hospital privileges of Dr. Dial without cause and without reason.
PROSECUTORIAL
MISCONDUCT : NO PROSECUTION OF THESE
CRIMES.
3. Step
No. 3 or
House No. 3 :
JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING.
The Hospital and Doctors conspired to
present false evidences at the Judicial Review Hearing which was held according
to Law , witnessed by nine ( 9 ) California – licensed practicing physicians ,
instantly recorded by the official court transcriber in the 100 – page
transcript of that hearing.
Dr.
Peter E. Philbin, as Hospital witness, lied under oath, on the witness stand,
recorded on pages 46, 47, and 48 of the transcript of that
Judicial Review Hearing.
Dr.
Leonard A. Brant, another Hospital witness, lied under
oath, on the witness stand . His lies,
deceits, falsehoods and deceptions, misrepresentation of facts and perversion
of Truth are on pages 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , and 85 of the
transcript.
Steven
V. Schnier, the Hospital Attorney, told lies, deceits and frauds and these are
recorded on pages 8, 9, 14, 15, 24, 41,
56, 58, 60, 61, 66 of the transcript of that Judicial Hearing.
After
the Judicial Hearing, the Hospital and doctors claimed in writing that the
hearing never took place.
4. Step No. 4 : After the hearing, a Lawsuit was filed in the
California Superior Court in Solano County, Case No. 87291 against the hospital
and doctors because of the 53 crimes committed during the Judicial Review Hearing
and also because the job and Hospital Privileges of Dr. Lino Dial were removed by the Hospital and Medical
staff, without cause, and without
reason.
During
the Superior Court hearing, the main issue was not addressed or discussed :
1. No mention of the crimes of Dr. Blum which was
the very first crime and this was followed by all the other crimes.
2. No mention of the misrepresentation of
facts during the hospital investigation or Monitoring or Peer Review at the
hospital which preceded the Judicial Review Hearing.
3. No mention of the Perjury committed by
Dr. Philbin which was documented in the transcript of the hearing.
4. No mention of the Subornation of
Perjury committed by Dr. Frederick Lowe documented in the transcript of the
Judicial Review Hearing.
5. No mention during the Superior court
hearing about the Perjury committed by Dr. Leonard A. Brant documented during
the Judicial Review Hearing.
6. No mention of the lies, deceits,
misrepresentation of facts told by the Hospital attorney during the Judicial
Review Hearing and documented in the transcript.
7. Dr. Leonard A. Brant presented
three-pages of declaration or testimony, under oath, during the superior Court
Hearing.
These were proven to be
false. These were prepared by
Attorney Thomas E.
Pfalzer, ESQ of the Law firm of
McNamara, Houston , Dodge
et al
1211 Newell
Avenue , suite 200
Walnut Creek,
California 94596
The decision of the
California Superior Court in Solano County,
Case No. 87291
was based on lies , deceits, frauds, misrepresentation of facts, intentional
deceptions and Perversion of Truth.
Decision is Erroneous and invalid
And should be changed.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 5.
In the One – Page Summary No. 4, the four basic
steps in the Hospital cover Up were presented.
The Hospital and Doctors in the City of Vallejo,
California are like people who built houses on frauds or sand instead of solid
Rock. When floods or Florida hurricane
or Philippine typhoon came , they fell with a mighty crash.
Step No.
1 or house No. 1 are the crimes
of Dr. Blum.
Step No. 2
, 3 , and 4 are inseparable because the lies, deceits , frauds, deceptions and
falsehoods which were recorded in Step No. 2
or Hospital investigations were
the same lies , deceits , frauds , deceptions and falsehoods used or presented
during the Judicial hearing or Step No.
3.
The same lies , deceits ,
frauds, deceptions and falsehoods were concealed or not mentioned during the
California Superior Court Hearing in Solano County, Case No. 87291.
More frauds were presented
in Superior Court. Then the Superior
Court made a decision based on lies , deceits, frauds, deceptions and
falsehoods.
Starting on One – Page
Summary No. 6
More lies , deceits,
frauds, deceptions will be presented.
References :
1. Weinberg et al . Prosecutorial Misconduct and Courtroom
Misconduct , study of two thousand seventeen cases, published in the American
Lawyer.
2. Carlon , Ken. Federal Civil Rights lawsuit. Termination of Hospital Privileges without
cause, in Modesto, California Hospital, filed in San Francisco , U.S. District
Court by
Dr. Fahlen and Dr. Safari,
Modesto Bee, November 7, 2011
3. Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Hospital Cover
Up of 53 crimes in Vallejo, California, as noted in :
www.crimevictimspress.com
November 22, 2011.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 6
Documents
and evidences about the 53 crimes are in the California Medical Board and Dept.
of Justice.
Conspiracy
waives Statutes of Limitations. These
statutes do not apply when there is Conspiracy.
THE
CRIMES OF ATTORNEY STEVEN V. SCHNIER OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.
Attorney Schnier is the Senior Partner in
the Law firm of
Hanson Bridgett
LLP located on the 26th
floor at 425 Market St.,
San
Francisco, California 94105.
Mr.
Schnier is a graduate of Stanford University Law School in California. He had a B.S. degree from University of
California. He is among the Best Lawyers
in America ( 1995 – 2011 ).
Northern
California Super Lawyers ( 2006 – 2011 ).
THIS
IS HOW ATTORNEY SCHNIER COMMITTED HIS CRIMES.
1. Judicial Hearing was held in the city
of Vallejo, California.
2. Attorney Schnier committed the crimes
during the hearing.
3. The crimes of Mr. Schnier were
witnessed by Physicians.
4. The crimes of Mr. Schnier were
instantly recorded by the official court transcriber in the 100 – page
transcript of that same Judicial Review Hearing.
THIS
IS HOW ATTORNEY SCHNIER COMMITTED HIS CRIMES :
(
continued ) :
5. Mr. Schnier was the Hospital Attorney
at the hearing.
6. Mr. Schnier proclaimed , declared and
presented the fraudulent, deceitful , misrepresentation of facts, wrongful
criminal deceptions prepared by the Hospital and Medical Staff. These were
submitted and accepted as true, evidences during the Judicial Review Hearing.
7. The entire Judicial Hearing was about
Dr. Lino Dial.
8. The pages mentioned here as evidences
are from the transcript.
9. On
page 7 lines
4 – 8 of the transcript : Mr. Schnier said : Initially, there was (
Hospital ) investigation ( of Dr. Dial ).
Then as a result of that, a Monitoring Program ( of Dr. Dial ), and then
finally an Executive Committee ( of Medical Staff ) recommendation against
reappointment ( of Dr. Dial ) to the Medical Staff. Then Dr. Dial requested a Judicial Review
Hearing which was granted by the hospital.
10.
On page
4 lines 19 – 22 :
Dr. Dial asked for the Criteria
used by the hospital and Medical Staff in the hospital investigation of Dr.
Dial , which took place one year before the Judicial Review Hearing. Hospital Attorney, Mr. Schnier: No criteria.
11.
On page
5 lines 1 – 14 :
Dr. Dial emphasized : Before the
Hospital investigation there should be a set of criteria to be used during the
hospital investigation. That was a year
ago. If it was available then , it
should be available now.
Dr.
Dial : “ where is the criteria ? “
12.
On page
66 lines 3 – 4 :
Dr. Dial emphasized the importance of random sampling of hospital
medical patient records to be reviewed during the hospital investigation.
13.
On page
66 lines 4 – 5 :
Mr. Schnier said : “ I don’t think there ever was a random sampling .”
Comment
of Dr. Dial : No Criteria and No random
sampling means that the Hospital investigation of Dr. Lino Dial
was biased and
prejudiced !!!
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 7
Documents
and evidences about the 53 crimes are in the California Medical Board and Dept.
of Justice.
Prosecutorial
Misconduct : No prosecution of these
crimes.
JUDICIAL REVIEW
HEARING
In
the One – Page Summary No. 5
and No. 6 I
referred to pages of the transcript of the Judicial Review Hearing as evidences
lies, deceits, bias , prejudice, Perversion of Truth and intentional
misrepresentation of facts.
1. Page
4 lines 19 – 22 :
Dr. Dial asked for the criteria used in the investigation of Dr. Dial at
the hospital.
2. Page
5 lines 1 – 14 :
Dr. Dial continued asking for criteria.
3. Page
5 lines 17 – 22 :
Mr. Schnier said : No
criteria. He talked about questions from
the Executive Committee hospital care of my patients. ( Any person can ask
questions, but questions are not criteria ).
4. Page
6 lines 2 – 7 :
Hospital investigation of Hospital care of Dr. Dial was done because
there were questions and criticisms ( about Standard of care ). Nobody ever mentioned the intentional
falsification of hospital patient medical record performed by Dr. Robert S.
Blum to get money from an old woman.
This was well-documented in the hospital patient medical record. The Medical Staff Executive Committee did not
ask questions about the crimes of Dr. Blum and they did not investigate
him. That’s unfair.
5. Page
7 lines 27 – 28 :
Mr. Schnier said : “ These questions, in a sense, they are , if you
will, the criteria.”
6. Page
10 lines 1 – 15 :
Dr. Dial presented what criteria is.
These were formed or established in Minnesota in 1977. The criteria for Monitoring Procedure was
accepted/adopted by the AMA and CHA but not by this hospital.
A lawsuit in California Superior Court
about Medical Malpractice is a good example of having questions or questioning
or criticizing hospital care of a physician.
Dr. Leonard A. Brant was a hospital witness during the Judicial Review
Hearing. He was also the Chief of the
Executive Committee. Of course, Dr.
Brant did not investigate himself.
Examples :
1. Superior Court of California, Solano County,
Case No. VO7491 is a lawsuit filed
against Dr. Leonard A. Brant, his Urological Group, and this hospital. Filed by Attorneys Howard Moore, Jr. and
Darryl Parker; Negligence in doing
Cystoscopy, Circumcision. “ The
operation done at this hospital was performed in such an improper manner as to
leave the skin covering the penis torn all the way to the back, to the
testicles. As a result of the
negligence, Mr. B.V.S.’s penis has
shrunken and shriveled up close to his body.”…Has great pain and discomfort.
2. Very poor surgical technique, another
Urology case. A misplaced instrument
blocked right ureter; discharged from
hospital with signs of Kidney Failure.
Re-admitted eight days later for
removal of kidney damaged by poor Surgical Technic on first admission.
Because Dr. Brant was in charge of
investigations, no questions or criticisms were made about these cases, so they
investigated Dr. Lino
Dial.
These are not my patients. They were not investigated by the hospital.
More cases of Malpractice filed in
Superior Court of California in Solano County will be presented in the
One – Page Summary
No. 8.
None of them are my patients.
To be continued.
The end for now.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 8
TITLE
: HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN
VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA.
Author
: Dr. Lino Dial, I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.
CONSPIRACY
TO HIDE A CRIME IS A FEDERAL CRIME.
REFERENCES
:
1. The “ Los Angeles Madam “, Heidi
Fleiss, was convicted in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, CA for Conspiracy
to hide a crime in 1997. This was well –
publicized.
2. Conspiracy in the Hospital Cover Up of
53 crimes in the City of Vallejo, California were presented in the One – Page
summaries Numbers : 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ,
6 , 7.
QUESTION :
Is
Conspiracy to hide a crime any different in Los Angeles than in Vallejo,
California ?
3. Several cases of Substandard care were
committed by the Hospital and Doctors who investigated me extensively and
intensely. They had to fabricate or
manufacture charges against me as evidenced by the false testimony of Dr. Peter
E. Philbin on pages 46 , 47 , 48 of the transcript of the
Judicial Review Hearing for Dr. Dial and the false testimony under oath of Dr.
Leonard A. Brant on pages 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 of the transcript
of that same Judicial Review Hearing.
EXAMPLES
OF SUBSTANDARD CARE COMMITTED BY THE HOSPITAL AND DOCTORS WHO INVESTIGATED ME :
1. Superior Court of California , Solano County,
Case No. VO7491.
Filed
in Court against Dr. Leonard A. Brant and this hospital for Medical Malpractice
by Attorneys Howard Moore, Jr. and Darryl Parker of Oakland, California. This is a case of Mutilation of Penis
following circumcision.
2. Dr. Leonard A. Brant operated on a 72
– year old man. Because of Substandard
care and poor Surgical Technique , Dr. Brant punctured the Urinary Bladder of
this poor old man. Dr. Brant didn’t know
he did it. The poor old man developed
Bacteremia, Septicemia, and Peritonitis.
The Solano County Coroner performed an autopsy. Findings proved that Dr. Brant perforated the
Urinary Bladder.
Perforation of the Urinary Bladder was not
recognized during the hospitalization.
This was not my patient.
I
had nothing to do with the medical care of this patient.
Dr.
Brant did not investigate himself.
Dr.
Brant and the Medical Staff investigated me.
3. Mr.
W.S.H. was a 22 – year old man
with multiple injuries died in the Emergency Room of this hospital. The E.R. doctor tried for two hours to find a
Surgeon to take care of this patient.
His Social Security Number is :
568 – 25 – 4438. The Solano
County Coroner performed the autopsy.
4. Mr.
W.J.C. died in the Emergency Room
of this hospital. He was a case of Motor
Vehicle Accident. The Doctor on Call was
also the Chief of Surgery. He refused to
see this patient. No hospital
investigation of the doctor, a Surgeon.
You could have been this patient.
This was not my patient. They
investigated me.
5. Mr.
C.J.M. died in the Emergency Room
of this hospital on a different date. He
was also a Motor Vehicle Accident case.
The same doctor was on call. He
also refused to see this patient.
NO
HOSPITAL INVESTIGATION. THESE ARE NOT MY
PATIENTS AND YET THE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL STAFF INVESTIGATED ME INTENSIVELY AND
EXHAUSTIVELY.
THEY
DID NOT INVESTIGATE THEMSELVES.
THAT
IS MOST UNFAIR.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 9.
CONSPIRACY
TO HIDE A CRIME IS A FEDERAL CRIME.
REFERENCES
:
1. The “ Los Angeles Madam “, Heidi
Fleiss, was convicted in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, CA for Conspiracy
to hide a crime in 1997. This was well –
publicized.
2. Conspiracy to hide crimes in the Hospital
Cover Up of 53 crimes in the City of Vallejo, California 94589 were presented
in the One – Page Summaries numbers : 1
, 2 , 3 , 4, 5,6, 7, 8.
QUESTION
:
Is
Conspiracy to hide a crime any different in Los Angeles than in Vallejo,
California ?
LIST
OF LAWSUITS IN SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, IN SOLANO COUNTY FOR WRONGFUL ,
QUESTIONABLE , UNNECESSARY DEATHS DUE TO SUBSTANDARD HOSPITAL MEDICAL CARE.
None
of these patients ( not one ) belong to Dr. Lino Dial.
These
patients were under the care of Physicians and members of the Medical Staff
Executive Committee who investigated me.
While
their patients were dying and or while they were being sued in Superior Court
for Substandard Hospital Medical Care, they decided to investigate me.
But
I didn’t have a single wrongful death case.
I didn’t have a malpractice suit.
Now
the list of Lawsuits in Superior Court of California , in Solano County. Patient initials and Case No. or File No. in
Court :
1. D.D.
----- 78674
2. N.D.
----- 75612
3. D.T.
----- 78747
4. L.E.S. ----- 82283.
5. P.A.
---- 69630 settled for $ 50,000.00
6. M.B.
----- 69355
7. V.D. -----
77765 settled out of Court.
8. L.W.W. ----- 80421.
To
be continued.
The
end for now.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 10.
CONSPIRACY
TO HIDE A CRIME IS A FEDERAL CRIME.
REFERENCES
:
1. The “ Los Angeles Madam , Heidi
Fleiss, was convicted in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles for Conspiracy to
hide a crime in 1997. This was well –
publicized.
2. Conspiracy to hide a crime in the Hospital
Cover Up of 53 crimes in the City of Vallejo, California 94589 were presented
in the One – Page Summaries Nos.
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, and 9.
QUESTION
:
Is
Conspiracy to hide a crime any different in Los Angeles than in Vallejo,
California ?
List
of Lawsuits filed in Superior Court of California, in Solano County for Medical
Negligence or Medical Malpractice. None
of these patients belong to Dr. Lino Dial .
These patients were under the care of the members of the Medical Staff
Executive Committee who investigated me intensively and exhaustively.
Initials
of patients and Case No. or File No. in Court are used :
LIST
OF LAWSUITS IN SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SOLANO COUNTY :
1. J.E.Q.
---- 69320 Breast and Lung removed
for Cancer. On
Tissue
examination, No Cancer at all. This was
settled in Court for $ 95,000.00.
2. L.V.
---- 80947
3. J.H.F. ---- VO2130
4. L.A.J. ---- 80593
5. B.C. ---- 80437
6. D.N.T. ---- 81504
7. B.V.S. ---- VO7491
8. H.F. ---- 78916
9. L.E.S. ---- 73313
10.
A.R.
– 70829
11.
M.B.—80805
To
be continued.
The
end for now.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 11.
CONSPIRACY
TO HIDE A CRIME IS A FEDERAL CRIME.
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY DR. PETER E. PHILBIN.
STEP
BY STEP AND VIVID DESCRIPTION OF HOW DR. PHILBIN COMMITTED THE CRIMES.
1. The crimes of Dr. Philbin were covered
up by the hospital and Medical Staff.
2. Documents and evidences about these
crimes were submitted to the California Medical Board during an official
investigative hearing held in Sacramento on February 26, 2008 and again on June
24, 2008 inside the Medical Board office.
3. Mr. Robert Sherer, Senior Investigator of the
California Medical Board accepted all the evidences and documents.
4. Dr. Peter E. Philbin committed his crimes
during a Judicial Review Hearing held according to Law in Solano County, Calif.
5. Nine ( 9 ) California Physicians witnessed or
saw Dr. Philbin while he was committing the crimes.
6. The official court transcriber instantly
recorded the crimes of Dr. Philbin in the 100 – page transcript of that
Judicial Hearing.
7. This is an eyewitness report.
THE
EVIDENCE : TRANSCRIPT OF THE JUDICIAL
REVIEW HEARING.
1. Page
12 lines 15 – 16 :
“ Next witness for the Executive Committee is Dr. Philbin who is now
sitting before you. “
2. Page
12 lines 17 – 18 :
“ would you swear the witness in please.”
3. Page
12 lines 20 – 21 :
“ Peter E. Philbin, M.D. , being first duly sworn, testified as follows
“ :
4. Page
43 lines 20 – 21 : “ Dr. Dial should have ordered a
Cardiology Consultation.”
5. Page
44 line 10 : “
Cardiology Consultation would be very advisable .”
6. Page
46 line 16 :
Cardiologist examined the patient.
7. Page
46 line 18 :
Cardiologist examined the patient.
8. Page
47 line 8
: Cardiologist did see the
patient.
9. Page
47 line 28 :
Cardiologist examined the patient.
10.
Page 48
Line 1 : Cardiologist’s note was read.
11.
Page 48
Line 3 : “ Dr. Dial, you are referring to the medical
record ? “
12.
Page 48
Line 5 : Dr. Dial answers : “ Yes .”
CONCLUSION
:
1. Dr. Philbin accused Dr. Dial of not
getting a Cardiology Consultation, under oath, on the witness stand during the
Judicial Review Hearing.
2. It was proven beyond any reasonable doubt that
Dr. Dial obtained a Cardiology Consultation, as noted in the transcript.
3. Dr. Philbin told a lie , deceits , frauds ,
falsehoods , deceptions while under oath, on the witness stand, during the
Judicial Review Hearing, documented in the transcript.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 12.
THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY DR. PETER
E. PHILBIN.
Dr.
Philbin is a California – licensed practicing Physician.
Dr.
Philbin’s specialty is Nephrology or Diseases of the Kidney.
Dr.
Philbin was a member of the Medical Staff Executive Committee which decides
investigation of Doctors in the hospital.
Dr.
Philbin was not investigated.
Dr.
Philbin was not reported to the California Medical Board.
Dr.
Philbin was not reported to the California Dept. of Justice.
Dr.
Philbin was not prosecuted for his crimes.
STEP
BY STEP AND VIVID DESCRIPTION OF HIS CRIMES :
1. Dr. Philbin was the witness for the Hospital
Medical Staff Executive Committee as noted on
Page 12 of the transcript.
2. Dr. Philbin and the Hospital Medical
Staff Executive Committee conspired, connived and agreed among themselves to
present false evidences against me during the Judicial Review Hearing.
3. Dr. Philbin accused me of not getting
a Cardiology Consultation on my patient.
He made this accusation under oath, on the witness stand during the
Judicial Hearing. This was instantly
recorded in the transcript as noted on One – Page Summary Number 11.
4. The accusation of Dr. Philbin to be false beyond
any doubt.
5. In the One – Page Summary
No. 11, I stated on a few occasions , that I obtained
a Cardiology Consultation.
6. The name of the Cardiologist was in the
transcript and this was read by the physicians during the Judicial Review
Hearing. Despite this proven fact , the
Hospital and Medical Staff removed my job and Hospital Privileges without cause
and without reason.
7. When it was proven in the hospital
medical patient record that the accusation of Dr. Philbin was false, Dr.
Philbin blushed !!
BLUSHING
IS A MEDICAL PHENOMENON WHEREIN A PERSON SUDDENLY TURNS RED IN THE FACE. IT IS A REFLEX ACTION.
Dr.
Philbin blushed because he was embarrassed that he made a false accusation
against me. Not only that, he just
committed the crime of Perjury or telling a lie or deceit or falsehood under
oath, on the witness stand. This is well
– documented in the transcript.
To
be continued.
The
end for now.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 13.
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY DR. LEONARD A. BRANT.
Dr.
Brant is a California – licensed practicing physician.
Dr.
Brant’s specialty is Surgery, diseases of the Urinary system.
Dr.
Brant was the Chief of the Hospital Medical Staff Medical Executive Committee
which decides investigation of Doctors.
Dr.
Brant did not investigate himself.
Dr.
Brant told lies and falsehoods about me then he investigated me.
Dr.
Brant was not reported to the California Medical Board.
Dr.
Brant was not reported to the California Dept. of Justice.
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY DR. LEONARD BRANT ( continued ) :
Dr.
Brant was not prosecuted for his crimes.
Dr.
Brant committed his crimes during a Judicial Review Hearing.
THE
EVIDENCE : TRANSCRIPT OF THE JUDICIAL
HEARING.
1. Page
53 Lines 9 – 10 :
“ The next witness for the Executive Committee is Dr. Leonard Brant.”
2. Page
53 Lines 11 – 12 :
“ Would the Court reporter please swear Dr. Brant in ? “
3. Page
53 Lines 14 – 15 : Leonard Brant, M.D. being first
duly sworn in testified as follows :
4. Page
53 Line 25 :
“ I am the Chief of Staff .”
5. Page
53 Line 28 :
“ I am the Chairman of the Executive Committee.”
6. Page
79 Lines 12 – 13 :
“ Dr. Brant , you mentioned Cardiac Seizure as a Diagnosis made by Dr.
Dial in the medical record.”
7. Page
79 Lines 15 – 16 :
Dr. Brant says : “ Yes .”, that’s one of the things he ( Dr. Dial )
considered. Dr. Brant accused Dr. Dial
of making a diagnosis of Cardiac Seizure in the hospital patient medical record
and he said it under oath on the witness stand.
8. Page
79 Lines 17 – 28 :
The medical record was read. It
was proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the accusation of Dr. Brant was
false. It was not in the hospital
patient medical record. Dr. Brant made
it up. He fabricated it , a product of his imagination.
9. Page
83 Line 12 :
The accusation against Dr. Lino Dial was that Dr. dial made a wrong or
inappropriate interpretation or reading of the electrocardiogram or EKG or
Cardiogram.
10.
Page 83
Lines 13 – 15 : Dr. Dial did not read the EKG.
11.
Page 83
Line 22 : Dr. Brant kept looking in Dr. Dial’s progress
notes, hoping or maybe he would find the wrong reading or interpretation of the
Cardiogram by Dr. Dial. Dr. Brant was
given plenty of time in his search of the record.
12.
Page 84
Lines 14 – 15 : “ Is that an interpretation of the Cardiogram
?”
13.
Page 85
Lines 11 – 13 : “ I don’t see any
evidence that Dr. Dial made an interpretation of the electrocardiogram.”
CONCLUSION
:
While under oath, on the witness stand ,
Dr. Brant made two accusations against Dr. Dial. Both accusations were proven false beyond any
reasonable doubt. Both accusations were
products of his imagination. He made
them up !!
Dr. Brant just committed the crimes of
Perjury, two times !!
To
be continued.
The
end for now.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 14.
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY STEVEN V. SCHNIER OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.
Attorney
Schnier is a graduate of Stanford University Law School.
He
had a B.S. degree from the University of California. He is among the Best Lawyers in America (
1995 – 2011 ).
Northern
California Super Lawyers ( 2006 – 2011 ).
Attorney
Schnier is a Senior Partner in the Law firm of
HANSON BRIDGETT
LLP
425 Market Street, 26th floor
San
Francisco, California 94105.
Tel.
: 877 – 342 – 6766 ( toll free ); Tel.
415 – 777 – 3200
Tel. 415 -
442 - 3333. Tel.
415 – 995 – 5018
Tel. 415 -
995 - 5075 Tel.
415 - 925 - 8400
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY SCHNIER ( continued ) :
Mr.
Schnier committed his crimes during a Judicial Review Hearing which was held
according to Law in the City of Vallejo, California 94589. There were nine ( 9 ) California – licensed
practicing physicians who saw and heard Mr. Schnier while he was committing the
crimes of fraud and Conspiracy. The
official Court transcriber instantly recorded the crimes committed by Mr.
Schnier in the 100 – page transcript of that Judicial Hearing. Copy of the transcript was submitted to the
California Medical Board.
PROSECUTORIAL
MISCONDUCT : NO PROSECUTION OF THESE CRIMES.
THE
EVIDENCE : TRANSCRIPT OF THE JUDICIAL
REVIEW HEARING.
1. It should be stated at the outset (
start ) that Mr. Schnier was the Attorney for the Hospital and Medical Staff.
2. The Hospital , Medical Staff and
Attorney Schnier had about six months to prepare their case for the Judicial
Review Hearing.
3. During those six months, the hospital,
Medical Staff and Attorney Schnier conspired and agreed to prepare false
evidences against me.
4. The false , deceptive , and fraudulent
evidences were submitted by Mr. Schnier as Exhibits No. 1 through
14 and accepted as evidences during the Judicial Review Hearing ( as noted
on page 3 Lines
15 – 16 of the transcript of the Judicial Hearing).
5. In the
One – Page Summaries numbers
11, 12 and 13, the lies , deceits and falsehoods that came out of the
lying lips and deceitful tongues of Dr. Peter E. Philbin and Dr. Leonard Brant
were presented , described , and recorded.
6. After the Judicial Hearing, the
hospital and Medical Staff declared in writing and officially proclaimed that
this Judicial Review Hearing never took place or it did not happen because Dr.
Lino Dial canceled it. But Dr. Dial was present at the hearing.
7. The evidences that the Judicial
Hearing was held are the 100 – page transcript and Dr. Dial was present at the
hearing.
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY SCHNIER ( continued ) :
The
official written declaration and proclamation of the Hospital and Medical Staff
is that the Judicial Review Hearing did not happen or did not take place
because Dr. Dial canceled it.
QUESTION
:
HOW COULD DR. DIAL CANCEL THE HEARING
WHICH HE ATTENDED ?
To
be continued.
The
end for now.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 15.
CONSPIRACY
TO HIDE A CRIME IS A FEDERAL CRIME.
REFERENCES
:
1. Conspiracy : U.S. Code ,
Title 18 , Section 241 (Civil Rights).
2. Conspiracy : Calif. Criminal Code, Title 7, Chap. 8,
Section 182.
3. Conspiracy, Fraud : Operation Rezone
: FBI investigation in 1993 – 1995
involving Real Estate developers and officials in the City of Fresno,
California, several convicted for Frauds, etc.
4. Conspiracy : The “ Los Angeles Madam “
convicted in 1993-1997 of Conspiracy to hide a crime , etc.
QUESTION
:
Is Conspiracy to hide a crime any
different in Fresno and Los Angeles than in Vallejo, California ?
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY SCHNIER (continued ):
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY SCHNIER ( continued ) :
PROSECUTORIAL
MISCONDUCT : NO PROSECUTION OF THE 53
CRIMES.
THE
EVIDENCE : TRANSCRIPT OF THE JUDICIAL
HEARING.
1. Page
3 Lines 13 – 16 :
Exhibits Nos. 1 through
14, were submitted by Attorney Schnier as evidence in behalf of the
Hospital and Medical Staff which he represents.
2. Page
4 Lines 19 – 22 :
Dr. Dial asked for the criteria used during the monitoring program or
Peer Review or hospital investigation of Dr. Dial. No criteria provided.
3. Page
5 Lines 12 – 13 :
No criteria provided at the hearing. No criteria means the investigation
was biased and prejudiced.
4. Page
5 Lines 20 – 22 :
There were questions about the practice of Medicine of Dr. Dial. Anybody can ask questions but questions are
not criteria.
5. Page 7 Lines 27 – 28 : The questions
are in a sense, the criteria
6. Page
8 Lines 7 – 23 :
The Monitoring Program ( Hospital investigation of Dr. Dial ) was
instituted by the Medical Staff Executive Committee , to last for six months ,
done one year before the Judicial Review Hearing.
7. Page
8 Lines 24 – 25 :
Question for Mr. Schnier by Dr. Dial :
“ Did you ask for or receive monitoring reports ? “
Mr.
Schnier answers : “ Yes .”
To
be continued.
The
end for now.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 16.
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY SCHNIER (continued ) :
The
last item ( No. 7 ) on the One –
Page Summary No. 15
is connected or related to the next ten crimes of fraud committed by Attorney
Schnier.
1. Page
8 Lines 24 – 25 :
Dr. Dial asked Mr. Schnier : “
Did you ask for or receive monitoring reports from doctors who monitored me ? “
2. Page
8 Line 26 :
Mr. Schnier answered : “ Yes. “
3. Page
8 Lines 27 – 28 : Dr. Dial asked Mr. Schnier again :
“ were there reports submitted by the doctors ? “
4. Page
9 Line 1 :
Mr. Schnier answered : “ Yes. “
The
six month period of hospital investigation of Dr. Dial was noted in the One –
Page Summary No.
15.
During
the hearing, Mr. Schnier presented a patient who was supposedly admitted or
hospitalized during the six months of hospital investigation of Dr. Dial.
Fraud
No. 1 : On examining the hospital
patient medical record, it was revealed that this patient had been dead and
buried in the cemetery for one year before the hospital investigation. So this patient was not hospitalized. This is obviously a fraud.
Fraud
No. 2 : Mr. Schnier said he received
monitoring reports. Whoever submitted
that medical report made a false report.
Fraud
No. 3 : Mr. Schnier said the doctor
examined the patient and submitted a monitoring report. The patient was not in the hospital at all
because he was dead and buried in the cemetery.
This is obviously another fraud.
To
be continued.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 17.
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY SCHNIER (continued) :
REFERENCE
:
Procedures
by Hospital Medical Staff in determining whether to terminate Physician’s Staff
Privileges Must be Fundamentally fair.
Suckle vs.
Madison General Hospital
362 F.
supp. 1196 , Affirmed
499 F. 2d.
1364
Description
of the crimes :
1. In the One – Page Summary
No. 15, page 8 Lines 7-23 :
The Monitoring Program ( Hospital
investigation of Dr. Dial) was instituted by the Medical Staff Executive to
last for six months. In other words,
they made the rule that patients I admitted to the hospital during those six
months will be monitored or examined or investigated.
2. In the One – Page Summary
No. 16 , the hospital Medical
Staff and their Attorney broke or did not follow their own rule. The evidence for not following their own rule
was when Mr. Schnier presented and discussed a patient who was not hospitalized
at all during the established six months of monitoring period. The patient had been dead and buried in the
cemetery for one year before the investigation.
3. In so doing, Mr. Schnier committed
Frauds No. 1, No.2 and 3. If you get a
copy of the transcript of the Judicial Review Hearing from the California
Medical Board and Dept. of Justice, you will verify that this patient discussed
by Mr. Schnier is found on page 56
Lines 16 – 17. Attorney Schnier made a wrongful criminal
deception, willful and deliberate misrepresentation of facts and intentional
perversion of Truth.
4. A second patient who was dead and
buried in the cemetery was presented by the hospital witness, Dr. Leonard A.
Brant. Mr. Schnier asked him questions
about the patient. This second patient
is documented in the transcript of the Hearing :
Page 59
Lines 22 – 24 : Discussion of the hospital care of the
patient two years before the monitoring period.
Page 60
Lines 21 – 22 : Discussion of the
hospital care of the patient one and two years before the monitoring period.
Page 61
Lines 6 – 9 : “ This patient died before the six months of
monitoring or investigation of Dr. Lino
Dial.”
Page 62
Lines 15 – 28 : “ The
Utilization Review Committee was critical of Dr. Dial’s utilization over the
course of several years” ( actually six years , since Dr. Dial complained about
the Falsification of Hospital patient medical record for money performed by Dr.
Robert S. Blum , a Neurosurgeon, as
noted on the One – Page Summaries
numbers 1 , 2 , and 3.
Fraud
No. 4 : The second patient was not
hospitalized during the six months monitoring or investigation of Dr. Dial.
Fraud
No. 5 :
Mr. Schnier said that he had asked for and received a monitoring report
on my patients who were investigated.
How
could this patient be monitored in the hospital ? He was not even in the hospital.
Fraud No. 6
: Mr. Schnier said that the doctor who
monitored this patient made and submitted a monitoring report. That report must be a fraud.
Evidence
: Page
8 Lines 24 – 26 :
Mr. Schnier asked for and received monitoring reports from the doctors
who monitored me.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 18
THE
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ATTORNEY SCHNIER (continued) :
REFERENCE
:
U.S.
Supreme Court Decision : 1966
Revocation
Proceedings “ Hospital Medical
Privileges “ were
Similar
to a Criminal case.
Shively v.
Stewart ( 1966 ) 65 Cal.
2d. 475, 55 Cal Rptr 217.
Description
of the crimes :
1. In this
One – Page Summary No. 18
, the crimes of Fraud numbers 7 , 8 ,
and 9 are presented. These took place
during a Judicial Review Hearing and the evidence is in the transcript. The
hospital, Medical Staff and Attorney Schnier prepared and submitted as evidence
during the hearing , intentional deceptions and misrepresentation of facts.
The
evidence : Transcript of the Judicial
Review Hearing.
1. Page
12 Lines 14 – 26 :
Dr. Peter E. Philbin was sworn in as witness for the hospital and
Medical Staff Executive Committee.
2. Page
14 Lines 24 – 28 :
“ This is a patient that was not
seen during the period of monitoring ? “
3. Page
15 Lines 1 – 3 :
Attorney Schnier answered : “
This was a patient that was seen approximately one year before the monitoring
began. “
4. Crime of Fraud
No. 7 : Attorney Schnier admitted during the Judicial
Hearing that this patient was not seen during the six months of monitoring or
investigation period. ( For that matter,
anytime before could have been fifty or a hundred years before the monitoring
began. )
5. Crime of Fraud
No. 8 :
Recall that on Page 8 Lines 24-26 of the transcript, Mr. Schnier
said that he had asked for and received monitoring reports. How could this patient be monitored in the
hospital when he was not hospitalized during the monitoring period ? This is another willful and deliberate
misrepresentation of facts with intention to deceive others.
6. Crime of Fraud
No. 9 : Mr. Schnier said that he received a hospital
monitoring report from the doctor who monitored me. First of all, the Doctor had to examine the
patient before he could make a report.
But the patient was not hospitalized !!
How could the Doctor examine him ?
Much less make a report. This is
another fraud or false representation of facts during the legal proceeding held
according to Law in the City of Vallejo, California.
To
be continued.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 19
THE
CRIMES OF ATTORNEY SCHNIER ( continued ) :
REFERENCE
:
Physician’s
Hospital Staff Privileges are a liberty interest by the 14th
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Reference
: 5th Cir.
1975 507 F.
2d. 625 , 628.
Description
of the crimes :
1. In the
One – Page Summary No. 15
, on page 8
lines 7-23 of the transcript of
the Judicial Hearing : The monitoring
program of hospital investigation of Dr. Dial was instituted by the Medical
Staff Executive Committee to last for six months. This established the “ playing field “ so to
speak. The “ ball park “ or location was agreed upon, such as “ Michigan “.
2. When the hospital , Medical Staff and Attorney
Schnier presented several patients who were not hospitalized during the six
months’ period of hospital monitoring or investigation, in effect , they did not want to follow their own
rule. The established “ playing field “
or the “ ball park “ was going to be “ Michigan “. When the game time came, they decided to play
in “ Madrid “ or “ Manila “.
That is most unfair !!
Examples
:
1. Crimes of Fraud No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 were about a patient who had been dead for a
year before the monitoring began.
2. Crimes of Fraud No. 4 , No. 5 , and No. 6 were about a similar
patient.
3. Crimes of Fraud No. 7 , No. 8 , and No. 9 were about a
patient who was not hospitalized during the monitoring period. In the game of sports , they were outside the
“ playing field “ or the “ ball park “.
In every patient presented who was not hospitalized during the
monitoring period , three crimes of Fraud were committed. These include :
No hospitalization during
the monitoring period.
No hospital monitoring or
examination by doctors.
No hospital monitoring
report by the doctor.
These are intentional deceptions and
misrepresentation of facts on the part of the hospital, Medical Staff and
Attorney Schnier.
The
evidence :
Page 8
Lines 24 – 26 of the transcript of the Judicial Hearing
: Mr. Schnier asked for and received hospital
monitoring reports from the doctors who monitored me. But these patients were not even in the
Hospital.
4. Crimes of Fraud No. 10
, No. 11 , and No. 12.
Page 17
Lines 9 and 10 : Mr. Schnier and the hospital witness , Dr.
Philbin presented and discussed a patient who was hospitalized one year before
the hospital monitoring began. This is
another false representation of facts or perversion of truth because the
patient was not hospitalized during the monitoring period.
The Hospital, Medical Staff , Attorney
Schnier and the hospital witness were playing outside the “ ball park “. This is most unfair.
References
:
California Criminal
Code or Penal Code.Title 7
: Of Crimes
against Public Justice. Chapter 6
, Section 134 : Fraud.
Chapter 8
, Section 182
: Conspiracy.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 20.
CRIMES
COMMITTED DURING THE JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING.
REFERENCE
:
Unfair procedure in the so – called
investigation or monitoring or Peer – Review of Dr. Dial. This was done in Bad Faith.
No random sampling of the hospital patient medical record to be
reviewed during the hospital investigation period.
Reference
:
U.S.
Supreme Court Decision , May 16, 1988.
Dr.
Patrick vs. Burget et al ( Doctors who did Bad Faith Peer
Review). Dr. Patrick won the case . This was the Cover Story of World Medical
News , June 27, 1988.
Description
of the crimes.
1. The Hospital , Medical Staff , their attorney,
Mr. Schnier prepared and submitted false evidences against me during the
Judicial Review Hearing. They are
supposed to be True until challenged or proven false as what is happening now.
2. The reason for the Judicial Review Hearing was
that the Hospital and Medical Staff terminated the Hospital Privileges of Dr.
Lino Dial after a Bad – Faith hospital
investigation or monitoring program ( of Dr. Dial ).
3. In the One – Page Summary
No. 15 Lines 7 – 23 :
It says the monitoring program or hospital investigation of Dr. Dial was
instituted by the Medical Staff Executive Committee to last for six months.
The
evidence :
Evidence
for No random sampling in the hospital Peer Review :
Page 66
Lines 3 – 4 : Dr. Dial says , random sampling is very
important.
Page 66
Lines 5 - 6 :
Mr. Schnier answers : “ I don’t think there ever was random sampling . “
Page 66
Lines 16 – 19 : Question for Mr. Schnier : “ So there was no randomness and not all the
charts were reviewed --- just certain charts --- and those charts were selected
because there were some questions about
them . “ Mr. Schnier answers : “ True . “
CONCLUSION
:
Attorney Schnier admitted during the
Judicial Review Hearing that there was no random sampling during the hospital
monitoring or Peer – Review or investigation of Dr. Dial. The so-called monitoring or
investigation was done
in Bad – Faith.
REFERENCE
:
Procedural
protections due Physician before termination of his Hospital Privileages set
forth :
42 U.S.C.A.
SS 1983, 1985
U.S.C.A. Const. Amend.
14.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY
NO. 21
CONTINUATION
: ENUMERATION OF THE 53 CRIMES.
1. In the One-Page Summary
No. 2 I presented the definition
of Fraud which include wrongful criminal deception , misrepresentation of facts
, willful deliberate intentional deception , and Perversion of Truth.
2. In the
One – Page Summary No. 19
, I pointed out that in every patient
presented by Attorney Schnier during the
Judicial Review Hearing that were not hospitalized during the monitoring period contains at least three counts of deceptions,
frauds or misrepresentation of facts .
3. The first three counts of frauds involved the
patient who had been dead for a year before the hospital investigation
began. This was described on page
56 of the transcript.
4. The crimes of Fraud No. 4 , 5 , and 6 involved a similar patient
described on pages 59 , 60 and 61 of the transcript.
5. The crimes of Fraud No. 7
, 8 , and 9 is about a patient described on pages 14 and 15 of the transcript of the hearing.
6. The crimes of Fraud No. 10
, 11 , and 12 is about a patient described on
page 24 of the transcript of the
hearing. This case was not hospitalized
during the monitoring period.
7. The crimes of Fraud No. 13
, 14 , and 15 is about a hundred year old man described on pages 41 and
42. He was not hospitalized
during the investigation period.
8. The crime of Fraud or intentional
misrepresentation of facts No. 16 is
described on page 43 Lines
20 , 21 , and 22. The charge or
accusation against Dr. Lino Dial : “ Dr. Dial should have ordered a Cardiology
Consultation . “ The evidence that the
charge or accusation against Dr. Dial is false is on Page
46 Line 18 :
Cardiologist examined the patient.
9. The crime of Fraud or Perversion of Truth No. 17
is on Page
43 Lines 27 – 28 :
“ Dr. Lowe recommends a Cardiology Consult “. The evidence that the charge or accusation
against Dr. Dial is false is on
Page 46 Line
18 : Cardiologist examined the
patient.
10.
The
crime of Fraud or intentional deception
No. 18 is on Page
44 of the transcript. The accusation
against Dr. Dial : Page 44
Line 10 : “ Cardiology
Consultation would be very advisable. “
Dr. Lowe did not know that the patient was examined by
the Cardiologist.
Dr.
Frederick Lowe opened his mouth without thinking or not using his brain.
To
be continued.
The
end for now.
TITLE : HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA.
Author : Dr. Lino Dial , I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY NO. 22.
CONTINUATION : ENUMERATION OF THE 53 CRIMES.
THE CRIMES OF PERJURY AND SUBORNATION OF PERJURY.
REFERENCE :
CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL OR PENAL CODE.
TITLE 7 : OF CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE.
CHAPTER 5 ; SECTION 118 ; PERJURY : LYING UNDER OATH , ON THE WITNESS STAND, DURING A JUDICIAL HEARING.
CHAPTER 5 ; SECTION 127 ; SUBORNATION OF PERJURY. EVERY PERSON WHO WILLFULLY PROCURES ANOTHER PERSON TO COMMIT PERJURY IS GUILTY OF SUBORNATION OF PERJURY.
EVIDENCE : TRANSCRIPT OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW HEARING.
- 1. In the One – Page Summary No. 21 , the last count of crime was No. 18.
- 2. Crime No. 19 is Perjury. While under oath on the witness stand , during the Judicial Review Hearing , Dr. Peter E. Philbin accused me of not getting a Cardiology Consultation. The accusation or charge against me is on page 43 lines 20 – 21. The accusation or charge was proven false beyond any reasonable doubt on page 46 lines 16 – 18. The hospital patient medical record was presented as evidence and it showed that this patient was seen and examined by a Cardiologist from San Francisco, CA. This is Perjury.
- 3. Crime No. 20 is Subornation of Perjury ( as defined above ).
- Dr. Frederick Lowe is a California – licensed physician. His specialty is Internal Medicine. Dr. Lowe allowed his testimony to be presented by Dr. Philbin at the Judicial Hearing. The testimony or declaration of Dr. Lowe was presented by Dr. Philbin under oath, on the witness stand. This is located on page 44 line 10 : “ Cardiology Consultation would be very advisable.”
On page 48 lines 3 – 12 the hospital patient medical record was presented as evidence. The hospital patient medical record showed that the patient was seen by the Cardiologist.
- 4. On page 48 lines 22 – 24 : Attorney Schnier said : “ If the patient was seen by a Cardiologist in Consultation , then we’ll withdraw the criticism ( charge ) of the hospital.”
That is like the mentality of a seven year old boy. The accusation or charge that was made against me was legal. It took six months for the Hospital and Medical Executive Committee and Attorney Schnier to prepare for this charge against me.
This was presented under oath , on the witness stand , during the Judicial Review Hearing, and witnessed by nine ( 9 ) California – licensed practicing physicians.
When it was proven beyond any reasonable doubt that their accusation against me was a misrepresentation of fact , an intentional deception and a perversion of Truth , Mr. Schnier simply says : we are withdrawing the accusation against Dr. Lino Dial.
But they already committed crimes against me !! The hospital and Medical Staff removed my job without cause ; they removed my hospital privileges without reason. That is most unfair !!
This is crime of fraud or Intentional Deception No. 21.
To be continued.
The end for now.
March 29, 2012
Date prepared : March 18 , 2012 Sunday
Date posted : March 29, 2012.
To be posted on the World Wide Web.
TITLE : HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA.
Author : Dr. Lino Dial , I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY NO. 23
CONTINUATION : ENUMERATION OF THE 53 CRIMES.
In the One – Page Summary No. 22 , the last crime described was Crime No. 21.
It was an Intentional Deception. The evidence : Transcript of the Hearing.
- 1. On page 53 lines 9 – 10 : “ The next witness for the Executive Committee is
- Dr. Leonard A. Brant . “
- 2. On page 53 lines 11 – 12 : “ Could the court reporter please swear Dr. Brant”.
THIS IS HOW DR. BRANT COMMITTED HIS CRIMES.
- 3. On page 55 : Dr. Brant presented the hospitalization of Mrs. S.P. , 59 yr. old.
- 4. On page 55 lines 11 – 13 : Mr. Schnier declares : “ So this would be a case or a hospitalization which occurred before the formal Monitoring Program began.” ( Any time before could mean 50 – 100 years ).
- 5. Crime of fraud or misrepresentation of fact No. 22.
This patient died about a year before the formal hospital monitoring program ( for Dr. Dial ) began.
Question :
How could she be hospitalized during the hospital investigation of Dr. Dial ?
She was already dead !!
- 6. Crime of fraud or Intentional Deception No. 23.
Attorney Schnier claimed that this patient was reviewed by a Monitor.
The evidence : Page 55 line 17 : “ This was reviewed by a monitor.”
Question :
How could this patient be monitored by a doctor ? She was not even in the hospital !! She had been dead and buried in the cemetery for about a year !!
- 7. Crime of fraud or Perversion of Truth No. 24.
Attorney Schnier said that this patient had a monitoring ( medical ) report submitted by a doctor. That report is definitely a fraud.
- 8. Page 61 line 6 : “ We’ve talked about a monitoring period …this case was in the hospital and died before the monitoring began …” and yet Mr. Schnier and Dr. Brant talk about or speak of monitoring reports.
- 9. Page 66 lines 9 – 10 : Mr. Schnier said : “ During the monitoring program each and every hospitalization was reviewed .” This is crime of fraud or Wrongful Criminal Deception No. 24 because I have a list of sixteen ( 16 ) patients who were admitted to the hospital during the monitoring period but were not reviewed.
Attorney Schnier just added sixteen ( 16 ) more frauds or lies, deceits, deceptions , falsehoods , and frauds to the list.
This will be presented in the One – Page Summary No. 24.
The running balance so far of the enumeration of the 53 crimes :
25 crimes plus 16 crimes equal 41 crimes.
We have not yet included the crimes of Conspiracy.
To be continued.
The end for now.
March 29, 2012
Date prepared : March 18, 2012 Sunday
Date posted : March 29, 2012.
To be posted on the World Wide Web.
TITLE : HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO , CALIFORNIA.
Author : Dr. Lino Dial , I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY 24.
CONTINUATION : ENUMERATION OF THE 53 CRIMES.
In the One – Page Summary No. 23, the last crime described was No. 25.
Page 66 lines 9 – 10 : Attorney Schnier speaking : “ During the monitoring program each and every hospitalization was reviewed .”
The following is a list of sixteen ( 16 ) patients who were admitted to the hospital during the monitoring or hospital investigation of Dr. Lino Dial. The hospital provides a daily Doctor – Patient list. These are the patients of Dr. Lino Dial.
Previously posted at :
Patient Initials and Hospital Room number :
- 1. E.P.D. Room 307
- 2. B.R.N. Room 316
- 3. G.L.K. Room 317 – B
- 4. M.A.B. Room 416 – B
- 5. A. D. Room 306 – A
- 6. H. L. Room 316
- 7. E. O. Room 302
- 8. J. J. Room 301 – A
- 9. L. D. Room 306 – B
- 10. S. G. Room 307
- 11. I. B. Room 409
- 12. E. C. Room 301 – A
- 13. W. J. Room 401 – A
- 14. C. J. Room 405 – A
- 15. D. J. Room Admitted from the E.R. ( No room yet ).
- 16. S. C. Room 413 – A
These sixteen ( 16 ) patients were hospitalized but not monitored.
Mr. Schnier just added sixteen ( 16 ) lies and deceits. Last count of the crimes was 25 plus 16 crimes equal 41 crimes.
On page 8 lines 24 – 26 : Mr. Schnier said he asked for and received monitoring reports.
The running balance is now 41 plus 16 equal 57 crimes.
My original count was 53 crimes. Not included are the two counts of Perjury committed by Dr. Brant , and that makes 59 crimes.
Not included are at least Ten counts of Conspiracy among the hospital, Medical Staff Executive Committee and Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
The total number of crimes , as of now is : 69.
March 29, 2012
Date prepared : March 18, 2012 Sunday
Date posted : March 29, 2012
To be posted on the World Wide Web.
TITLE : HOSPITAL COVER UP OF 53 CRIMES IN VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA.
Author : Dr. Lino Dial, I AM the victim of the 53 crimes.
ONE – PAGE SUMMARY NO. 25
On December 2, 2011 , I prepared the Outline for the Hospital Cover Up of 53 crimes. This was posted on the Internet on Dec. 5, 2011 and again on Jan. 4, 2012 at:
THE OUTLINE
I THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD DECLARED IN WRITING ;
No crimes committed by hospital and doctors in the City of Vallejo, California , so No prosecution was done.
The evidence :
I have many copies of the letter to me from the California Medical Board stating that no crime was committed by the Hospital and Doctors.
II LIST OF 53 CRIMES COMMITTED BY THE HOSPITAL AND DOCTORS IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO , CALIFORNIA AND THE HOSPITAL COVER UP.
Evidence :
I posted on the World Wide Web the list of the crimes committed by Hospital and Doctors in the City of Vallejo, California 94589. I made these into two volumes:
Volume - 1 : The Outline plus One – Page Summary Nos. 1 – 10.
Volume - 2 : One – Page Summaries , numbers 11 – 25 .
Originally I counted 53 crimes. After adding the crimes of Perjury and Conspiracy, the total is now : 69 crimes. Still this does not include Obstruction of Justice , and Violation of my Civil rights, Judicial Misconduct, Prosecutorial Misconduct, etc.
III REQUESTS FOR CRIMINAL ACTION :
Numerous requests for Criminal Action at the County, State and Federal levels.
Actually , I have done this and compiled these in a book :
Title : FALSIFICATION IS FRAUD.
Author : Dr. Lino Dial
The documents , letters , and evidences were bound in book form a few years ago.
The total number of pages is about 300 , all one – sided.
IV REFERENCES :
1. Olmeda, R.
Conspiracy waives Statutes of Limitations.
crimes
were committed. The crimes : Official Misconduct, Criminal Mischief, and
Falsifying records, in Broward County, Florida.
Published in Sun Sentinel, December 25, 2011.
2. Person arrested for Health Care Fraud , ABC News , September 5, 2011.
3. Dial , L.
Health Care Fraud Cover Up , www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial, September 1, 2011, September
8, 2011 , September 18, 2011.
4. Dial , L.
Requests for Criminal Action , with documents , submitted to Mark E.
Cullers, Assistant U.S. Attorney,
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno, CA 93721. www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial, February 4, 2009 and January 23, 2007.
5. Dial , L.
Health Care Fraud and Fraudulent Hospital Investigation. Failure to follow its own Hospital Bylaws.
Reference:
D.C.
D.C. 1973 Hospital can be held liable for failure to
follow its own Standard of Care.
Hicks v. U.S.
357 F.Supp. 434
Affirmed 511 F.2d.
407 167 U.S. App. D.C. 169
U.S. Code
Annotated 44A FPD
2d - 463.
6. Dial , L.
Health Care Fraud : Part – 6
Fraud or False , Fraudulent Hospital
Investigation in the City of Vallejo, Covered Up.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial, August 25, 2011.
6. Dial , L. Health Care Fraud : Part – 5
Mr. Robert Sherer, Senior
Investigator, Medical Board of California, accepted more details, evidences,
and documents about the crimes of Dr. Robert S. Blum, during a Medical Board
Hearing held on February 26, 2008. This
was posted:
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial, August 24, 2011.
7. Dial, L. Health Care Fraud : Part – 4
The crimes of Dr. Leonard
A. Brant, Physician. Lying under oath,
on the witness stand, during a Judicial Review Hearing, witnessed by nine ( 9 )
California – licensed practicing physicians and instantly recorded by the
official court transcriber on pages 80 , 81 , 82, 83 , 84 , 85 of the transcript
of that Judicial Review Hearing.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial, August 21, 2011.
8. Dial, L. Health Care Fraud : Part – 3
The crimes of Dr. Peter E.
Philbin , physician : Lying under oath,
on the witness stand, during a Judicial Review Hearing, witnessed by nine ( 9 )
California-licensed physicians and instantly recorded by the official court
transcriber on pages 46 , 47 , 48 of the
100 – page transcript of that hearing.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial, August 20, 2011.
9. Dial , L. Health Care Fraud : Part – 2
Definitions of Fraud and
Health Care.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial , August 19, 2011.
10. Dial , L. Health Care Fraud : Part – 1
Health Care Fraud month in
Calif. Is September 2011. Announced by
the California Medical Board.
http://www.mbc.ca.gov/Sept.-Fraud notice, August 19, 2011.
11. Dial , L. California Crimes, No Justice : Part – 7
Fraud on the Court and
Courtroom Misconduct.
California Superior Court
decision based on lies, deceits and false declarations of Dr. Leonard A. Brant,
a Surgeon, in Solano County, Calif. Case No. 87291. Decision is erroneous, invalid and should be
changed.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial , August 16, 2011.
12. Dial , L. California Crimes, No Justice : Part – 6
Attorney Steven V. Schnier
and the 53 crimes. Question and Answer
format ( about the 53 crimes ).
http://www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial , Aug. 15, 2011.
13. Dial , L. California Crimes, No Justice : Part – 5
The crimes of fraud and
robbery committed by a doctor,
Dr. Robert S. Blum, a
California-licensed Neurosurgeon.
Well-documented Intentional Falsification of Hospital patient medical
record to get money from a poor old woman.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial , August 14, 2011.
14. Dial , L. California Crimes, No Justice : Part – 4
Attorney Steven V. Schnier
of San Francisco, CA and the 53 crimes committed during a Judicial Review
Hearing held according to Law in Solano County, California.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial , August 12, 2011.
15. Dial , L. No Justice in California : Part – 3
Hospital Cover Up of 53
crimes committed by Hospital , Physicians , lawyers in Vallejo, California
94589.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial , August 11, 2011.
16. Dial , L. No Justice in California : Part – 2
Attorney Steven V.
Schnier, Senior Partner in the law firm of
Hanson Bridgett
LLP of San Francisco, California and the 53 crimes committed in the City
of Vallejo, California 94589.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial , August 11, 2011.
17. Dial , L. No Justice in California : Part – 1
Hospital Cover Up of 53
Crimes committed by hospital, Medical Staff, doctors and lawyers.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial , August 9, 2011.
18. California Medical Board
Investigations for Fraud , Dishonesty , making false statements. Newsletter, Publication of Medical Board,
April 2010, Vol. 114.
Dr. H.R.B. , of Los
Angeles, Fraud, Lost Med. License, Nov. 10, 2009.
Dr. C.R.B. , of Carmel,
CA, Crime, Lost Med. License, Nov. 23,
2009.
Dr. J.M.D. , of Poway, CA,
for Dishonesty and creating false document, Medical License revoked , December
21, 2009.
Dr. E.L.F. , of Pomona, CA , for making false
statement , Lost Medical License , January 4, 2010.
19. Physicians Hospital Staff Privileges
are a liberty interest protected by the 14th amendment of the
Constitution.
Reference :
(5th Cir.
1975 ) 507 F.2d
625 , 628
20. Revocation Proceedings of “ Hospital
Medical Privileges” were similar to a
Criminal Case.
Supreme Court
Decision 1966
Shively vs.
Stuart ( 1966 ) 65 Cal. 2nd
475 ; 55 Cal Rptr 217
21. Definition of Cover Up
www.google.com/what is cover up ?
www.wikipedia.com/what is cover up ?
22. Dial , L. Series of Fifty – three ( 53 ) Hospital
Falsifications , available at :
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial , 2011, 2010, 2009.
www.Facebook.com/LinoDial , 2011 , 2010 , 2009.
www.Twitter.com/LinoDial ,
2011 , 2010 , 2009.
Accessed November 26 – 27 , 2011.
23. Dial , L. Prosecutorial Misconduct, communication with
National Center for
Prosecution Ethics
National College of
District Attorneys
University of South
Carolina
1600 Hampton Street , suite
414
Columbia, SC 29208
24. Dial , L. Prosecutorial Misconduct , communication with
National District
Attorneys Association
99 Canal Center Plaza, suite
510
Alexandria , VA 22314
25. Dial , L. Communication with Mark
E. Cullers
Assistant U.S. Attorney
, U.S.
Dept. of Justice
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare
Street , suite 4401
Fresno , CA 93721
About Violation of my
Federal Civil Rights , Conspiracy , Frauds , Perjury , Obstruction of Justice.
February 4 , 2009 and
January 23, 2007.
26. Definition of Perjury in California
Criminal Code.
Title 7
: Of Crimes against Public
Justice.
Chapter 5
, Section 118 : Perjury.
Chapter 5
, Section 127
: Subornation of Perjury.
27. Definition of Fraud in California
Criminal Code.
Title 7
, Chapter 6
, Section 134
, Fraud.
28. Definition of Conspiracy in California
Criminal Code.
Title 7
, Chapter 8
, Section 182
, Conspiracy.
29. Definition of Conspiracy in U.S.
Code.
Title 18 ,
Section 241 : violation of Federal Civil Rights Act
31. Dial , L. Doctors Not Investigated. They committed crimes of fraud , lying under
oath , during a Judicial Hearing, witnessed by nine ( 9 ) licensed physicians,
and instantly recorded in the 100 – page transcript of that hearing.
32. Dial , L. Doctors Investigated by the California
Medical Board and who lost their Medical Licenses due to Fraud , Dishonesty
; Newsletter , Quarterly Publication of
the California Medical Board, July 2010 , vol.
115.
33. Peeno , L. Managed Care Ethics , intent to deceive ,
False representation; in U.S. House of Representatives, Hearing , Committee on
Commerce , Subcommittee on Health ,
May 30 , 1996.
34. Dial , L. Prosecutorial
Misconduct , communication with
Steve Weinberg,
the case of Ellen Reasonover, published in Railroaded. Federal Judge was Jean Hamilton. Successful defense of Ellen Reasonover by
Attorneys Cheryl Pilate and Charles
Rogers , in St. Louis , MO. Federal Court. Ms. Ellen
Reasonover was released
after 16 years in prison.
35. Dial , L. Prosecutorial Misconduct , California Dept.
of Justice Court Order No. 02 – 2007 –
183327 , signed on
December 23, 2008 by
Governor Jerry Brown , then Attorney General of California.
www.crimevictimspress.com , November 17, 2011.
36. Dial , L. Hospital Cover Up of 53 Crimes committed
during a Judicial Hearing , witnessed by nine ( 9 ) licensed physicians and
instantly recorded in the transcript of that hearing.
37. Dial , L. Erroneous decision in California Superior
Court, Solano County, California
Case No. 87291.
Decision in Court was based three pages of frauds and intentional false
declarations by Dr. Leonard A. Brant.
The three pages of Dr. Brant’s declaration was submitted as evidence in Court by :
Attorney Thomas E. Pfalzer
, ESQ of the Law firm of
McNamara , Houston , Dodge
et al
P.O. Box
5288
1211 Newell
Ave. suite 200
Walnut Creek , California 94596.
www.crimevictimspress.com
November 21, 2011.
38. Dial , L. Prosecutorial Misconduct and Courtroom
Misconduct in Hospital Cover Up of 53 Crimes in Vallejo, CA
www.crimevictimspress.com
November 22, 2011.
39. Cockerham, Sean. Prosecutorial
Misconduct.
Six Justice Dept. Lawyers
under investigation, for their handling of late Alaska Senator’s trial. One of those lawyers, Nicholas Marsh,
committed suicide last year ( 2010 ).
The Anchorage Daily News ,
November 9 , 2011.
40. Carlson, Ken . Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit.
Termination of Hospital
Privileges without cause in Modesto, California Hospital, Filed in San Francisco, U.S. District Court
by Dr. Fahlen and Dr. Safari, Modesto Bee, November 7, 2011.
41. Weinberg , et al . Prosecutorial Misconduct and Courtroom
Misconduct, Study of two thousand seventeen cases , published in the American
Lawyer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)